EEM vs. STXE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE).
EEM and STXE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EEM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. It was launched on Apr 11, 2003. STXE is a passively managed fund by Strive that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jan 30, 2023. Both EEM and STXE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EEM vs. STXE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EEM vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 4.61% | 33.98% | 6.49% | -0.17% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 11.39% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 11.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 11.39% return.
EEM
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -6.94%
- YTD
- 4.61%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 33.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
STXE
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -7.43%
- YTD
- 11.39%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- 1Y
- 49.56%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EEM vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EEM vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank
EEM
STXE
EEM vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 2.33 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 3.01 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.44 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 3.46 | -0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.62 | 14.57 | -4.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 2.33 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 1.13 | -0.78 |
Correlation
The correlation between EEM and STXE is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EEM vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison
EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than STXE's 2.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.12% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 2.41% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EEM vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, which is greater than STXE's maximum drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and STXE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.43% | -18.92% | -47.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.52% | -14.51% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.60% | -9.44% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.12% | -3.81% | -12.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 3.44% | +0.11% |
Volatility
EEM vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) is 9.51%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 11.84%. This indicates that EEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.51% | 11.84% | -2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.13% | 17.45% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.24% | 21.38% | -1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 16.39% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.32% | 16.39% | +3.93% |