EELV vs. SPMO
EELV (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EELV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EELV returned 6.55%/yr vs 20.77%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EELV charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
EELV vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EELV achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.45% return. Over the past 10 years, EELV has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 6.55%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.77% annualized return.
EELV
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- 4.49%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 14.63%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.55%
SPMO
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 10.84%
- YTD
- 28.45%
- 6M
- 27.50%
- 1Y
- 43.92%
- 3Y*
- 42.27%
- 5Y*
- 23.92%
- 10Y*
- 20.77%
EELV vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 4.49% | 21.97% | 1.90% | 8.85% | -3.98% | 16.15% | -3.89% | 8.89% | -5.40% | 24.89% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.45% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between EELV and SPMO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015 | 0.47 |
The correlation between EELV and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
EELV vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EELV
SPMO
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
EELV
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
EELV
SPMO
Communication Services
EELV
SPMO
Utilities
EELV
SPMO
Industrials
EELV
SPMO
Energy
EELV
SPMO
Healthcare
EELV
SPMO
Basic Materials
EELV
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
EELV
SPMO
Real Estate
EELV
SPMO
Technology
EELV
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EELV vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
EELV
SPMO
EELV vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EELV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.44 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.47 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 13.52 | -7.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EELV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 2.49 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 1.25 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 1.03 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 1.00 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
EELV vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EELV drawdown since its inception was -36.35%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EELV and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EELV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.35% | -30.95% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.22% | -12.70% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.79% | -20.13% | +8.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.04% | -22.74% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.35% | -30.95% | -5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.24% | -1.46% | -2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -4.60% | -4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 3.26% | -0.82% |
Volatility
EELV vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) is 3.39%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that EELV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EELV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 7.39% | -4.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 14.49% | -5.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.88% | 17.70% | -6.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 19.30% | -7.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 20.31% | -6.67% |
EELV vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EELV has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
EELV vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
EELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than SPMO's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 3.58% | 3.75% | 4.70% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 4.35% | 2.82% | 3.14% | 5.50% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.53% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.66% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EELV and SPMO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to EELV (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EELV dropped -36.35% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.77% vs 6.55% for EELV. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, EELV has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.77% return vs 6.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EELV.
EELV has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.66% for SPMO.
EELV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while SPMO is Momentum. EELV tracks S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EELV and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EELV and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer