EELV vs. EJAN
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN).
EELV and EJAN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EELV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Jan 13, 2012. EJAN is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. It was launched on Jan 1, 2020. Both EELV and EJAN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EELV vs. EJAN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EELV vs. EJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 3.75% | 21.97% | 1.90% | 8.85% | -3.98% | 16.15% | -4.72% |
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January | 0.86% | 14.78% | 2.69% | 5.37% | -8.01% | -1.53% | 10.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EELV achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly higher than EJAN's 0.86% return.
EELV
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- 1Y
- 20.71%
- 3Y*
- 11.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- 6.24%
EJAN
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 12.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 2.25%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EELV vs. EJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EELV has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EJAN's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EELV vs. EJAN — Risk / Return Rank
EELV
EJAN
EELV vs. EJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EELV | EJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 1.27 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 1.88 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 1.69 | +0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.31 | 8.03 | +1.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EELV | EJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.27 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.20 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.29 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between EELV and EJAN is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EELV vs. EJAN - Dividend Comparison
EELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, while EJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 3.61% | 3.75% | 4.70% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 4.35% | 2.82% | 3.14% | 5.50% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.53% |
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EELV vs. EJAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EELV drawdown since its inception was -36.35%, which is greater than EJAN's maximum drawdown of -22.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EELV and EJAN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EELV | EJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.35% | -22.23% | -14.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.22% | -7.42% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.04% | -22.00% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.91% | -3.84% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -5.92% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 1.58% | +0.64% |
Volatility
EELV vs. EJAN - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) at 5.22%. This indicates that EELV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EELV | EJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 5.22% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.40% | 6.46% | +1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 9.85% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.52% | 11.05% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.70% | 12.78% | +0.92% |