PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EELV vs. DIEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EELV vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EELV achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly lower than DIEM's 31.36% return. Over the past 10 years, EELV has underperformed DIEM with an annualized return of 6.55%, while DIEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.40% annualized return.


EELV

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
4.49%
6M
5.24%
1Y
14.63%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
6.55%

DIEM

1D
-1.07%
1M
8.55%
YTD
31.36%
6M
33.96%
1Y
57.28%
3Y*
27.91%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
9.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EELV vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
4.49%21.97%1.90%8.85%-3.98%16.15%-3.89%8.89%-5.40%24.89%
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
31.36%30.81%12.29%15.41%-20.61%6.92%1.27%12.23%-11.29%27.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EELV and DIEM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2016

0.83

The correlation between EELV and DIEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EELV vs. DIEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EELV
DIEM

Financial Services

37.4%
23.3%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
2.9%

Communication Services

9.6%
5.6%

Utilities

9.6%
4.1%

Industrials

8.9%
4.7%

Energy

6.5%
6.0%

Healthcare

5.4%
0.6%

Basic Materials

5.3%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
6.7%

Real Estate

2.6%
1.6%

Technology

0.2%
40.3%

Financial Services

EELV
37.4%
DIEM
23.3%

Consumer Defensive

EELV
10.8%
DIEM
2.9%

Communication Services

EELV
9.6%
DIEM
5.6%

Utilities

EELV
9.6%
DIEM
4.1%

Industrials

EELV
8.9%
DIEM
4.7%

Energy

EELV
6.5%
DIEM
6.0%

Healthcare

EELV
5.4%
DIEM
0.6%

Basic Materials

EELV
5.3%
DIEM
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EELV
3.8%
DIEM
6.7%

Real Estate

EELV
2.6%
DIEM
1.6%

Technology

EELV
0.2%
DIEM
40.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EELV vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EELV
EELV Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
EELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EELV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
EELV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

DIEM
DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EELV vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EELVDIEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.59

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

4.67

-2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.02

19.22

-13.20

EELV vs. DIEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EELV Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the DIEM Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EELV and DIEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EELVDIEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

3.16

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.67

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.54

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.54

-0.24

Drawdowns

EELV vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EELV drawdown since its inception was -36.35%, smaller than the maximum DIEM drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EELV and DIEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EELVDIEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.35%

-38.61%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.22%

-12.33%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.79%

-16.82%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-33.34%

+14.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.35%

-38.61%

+2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-2.43%

-1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-9.71%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.99%

-0.55%

Volatility

EELV vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) is 3.39%, while Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) has a volatility of 8.50%. This indicates that EELV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EELVDIEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

8.50%

-5.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

15.97%

-6.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

18.21%

-7.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.36%

16.93%

-5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.64%

17.59%

-3.95%

EELV vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EELV has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

EELV vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison

EELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than DIEM's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.32%2.99%4.92%4.45%6.31%4.06%2.75%5.98%3.87%2.61%0.35%0.00%
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
3.58%3.75%4.70%4.00%3.45%4.35%2.82%3.14%5.50%2.92%2.29%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


EELV and DIEM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIEM has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to EELV (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EELV dropped -36.35% vs DIEM's -38.61%.

On 10-year performance, DIEM leads with 9.40% vs 6.55% for EELV. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EELV has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIEM has performed better with a 9.40% return vs 6.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EELV.

EELV has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 2.32% for DIEM.

EELV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while DIEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. EELV tracks S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index, while DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EELV and 0.19% for DIEM.

DIEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EELV and DIEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer