EDOW vs. GRID
EDOW (First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF) and GRID (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index) are both exchange-traded funds - EDOW is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR, while GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOW returned 8.89%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for GRID. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDOW charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GRID.
Performance
EDOW vs. GRID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOW achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 28.91% return.
EDOW
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 5.68%
- 6M
- 5.68%
- 1Y
- 18.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- —
GRID
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 28.91%
- 6M
- 29.60%
- 1Y
- 51.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.27%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.76%
EDOW vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF | 5.68% | 15.46% | 13.17% | 15.47% | -7.45% | 18.82% | 6.64% | 24.69% | -2.04% | 11.90% |
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | 28.91% | 29.65% | 15.18% | 21.57% | -13.89% | 27.65% | 48.84% | 42.80% | -22.69% | 10.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOW and GRID is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2017 | 0.72 |
The correlation between EDOW and GRID shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EDOW vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDOW
GRID
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
EDOW
GRID
Financial Services
EDOW
GRID
-
Industrials
EDOW
GRID
Healthcare
EDOW
GRID
-
Consumer Cyclical
EDOW
GRID
Consumer Defensive
EDOW
GRID
-
Communication Services
EDOW
GRID
-
Energy
EDOW
GRID
-
Basic Materials
EDOW
GRID
Real Estate
EDOW
-
GRID
-
Utilities
EDOW
-
GRID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOW vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank
EDOW
GRID
EDOW vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDOW | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.45 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 4.42 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | 16.72 | -8.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDOW | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.67 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.85 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.57 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
EDOW vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOW drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOW and GRID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOW | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | -40.56% | +6.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -11.73% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.51% | -20.77% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | -29.64% | +7.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -1.33% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -8.43% | +4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 3.09% | -0.74% |
Volatility
EDOW vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) is 2.74%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that EDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOW | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 7.95% | -5.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.92% | 16.08% | -8.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 19.39% | -8.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 21.00% | -6.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 22.81% | -5.07% |
EDOW vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOW vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison
EDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than GRID's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF | 1.24% | 1.31% | 1.65% | 1.93% | 1.91% | 1.52% | 1.84% | 1.88% | 1.82% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | 0.77% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOW and GRID have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRID has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to EDOW (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOW dropped -33.72% vs GRID's -40.56%.
On 5-year performance, GRID leads with 17.84% vs 8.89% for EDOW. On fees, EDOW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EDOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GRID has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EDOW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.
EDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.77% for GRID.
EDOW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. EDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR, while GRID tracks NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EDOW and 0.70% for GRID.
GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOW and GRID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer