EDOW vs. DOG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EDOW (First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF) and DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) are both exchange-traded funds - EDOW is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR, while DOG is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the DJ Industrial Average (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOW returned 9.72%/yr vs -5.86%/yr for DOG. At a correlation of -0.93, they often move in opposite directions. EDOW charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DOG.

Performance

EDOW vs. DOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOW achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly higher than DOG's -6.92% return.

EDOW

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 1.31%
• 6M: 6.50%
• YTD: 9.11%
• 1Y: 17.91%
• 3Y*: 16.14%
• 5Y*: 9.72%
• 10Y*: —

DOG

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -0.50%
• 6M: -4.40%
• YTD: -6.92%
• 1Y: -12.40%
• 3Y*: -8.71%
• 5Y*: -5.86%
• 10Y*: -11.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDOW vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF	9.11%	15.46%	13.17%	15.47%	-7.45%	18.82%	6.64%	24.69%	-2.04%	11.90%
DOG ProShares Short Dow30	-6.92%	-8.40%	-5.62%	-7.05%	5.67%	-19.21%	-20.45%	-18.43%	3.55%	-11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between EDOW and DOG is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2017	-0.93

The correlation between EDOW and DOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.95 to -0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDOW vs. DOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDOW	DOG
Technology	22.7%	-
Financial Services	16.9%	90.0%
Industrials	13.6%	-
Healthcare	13.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	9.2%	-
Communication Services	6.2%	-
Energy	3.0%	-
Basic Materials	3.0%	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EDOW vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDOW

EDOW Risk / Return Rank: 60
EDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
EDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
EDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 61
EDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
EDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 55

DOG

DOG Risk / Return Rank: 2
DOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
DOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
DOG Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DOG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDOW vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EDOW	DOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	-1.01	+2.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	-1.36	+3.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	0.84	+0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	-0.83	+2.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.65	-1.53	+9.18

EDOW vs. DOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the DOG Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOW and DOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EDOW vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOW drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum DOG drawdown of -92.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOW and DOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDOW	DOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.72%	-92.90%	+59.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.73%	-15.02%	+6.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.51%	-30.86%	+15.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.98%	-35.93%	+13.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-92.82%	+92.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	-66.53%	+62.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	8.14%	-5.79%

Volatility

EDOW vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) at 2.38%. This indicates that EDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDOW	DOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	2.38%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.34%	9.74%	-1.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.68%	12.29%	-1.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.23%	14.82%	-0.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.67%	17.46%	+0.21%

EDOW vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DOG's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDOW vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison

EDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than DOG's 3.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DOG ProShares Short Dow30	3.39%	3.65%	5.72%	4.54%	0.41%	0.00%	0.14%	1.54%	0.86%	0.04%
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF	1.25%	1.31%	1.65%	1.93%	1.91%	1.52%	1.84%	1.88%	1.82%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDOW and DOG in my portfolio?

EDOW and DOG have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDOW or DOG?

EDOW has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to DOG (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOW dropped -33.72% vs DOG's -92.90%.

Which ETF is better, EDOW or DOG?

On 5-year performance, EDOW leads with 9.72% vs -5.86% for DOG. On fees, EDOW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDOW or DOG?

Over the 5-year period, EDOW has performed better with a 9.72% return vs -5.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDOW or DOG?

EDOW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DOG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDOW or DOG?

DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 1.25% for EDOW.

What is the main difference between EDOW and DOG?

EDOW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DOG is Inverse Equities. EDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR, while DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EDOW and 0.95% for DOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.