PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDOG vs. IDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDOG vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOG achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly lower than IDOG's 16.40% return. Over the past 10 years, EDOG has underperformed IDOG with an annualized return of 5.60%, while IDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.94% annualized return.


EDOG

1D
0.48%
1M
4.60%
6M
-1.86%
YTD
5.43%
1Y
17.86%
3Y*
10.16%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
5.60%
ALL TIME*
4.44%

IDOG

1D
0.05%
1M
5.40%
6M
10.61%
YTD
16.40%
1Y
34.66%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
10.94%
ALL TIME*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$66.37K$47.05K$56.13K
$1.71M$1.45M$1.24M

EDOG vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDOG
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
5.43%22.59%1.70%11.58%-10.50%11.71%7.99%13.26%-16.52%20.42%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
16.40%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%21.93%-13.47%25.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EDOG and IDOG is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014

0.68

The correlation between EDOG and IDOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.70 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDOG vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDOG
IDOG

Energy

13.5%
9.2%

Industrials

11.6%
12.3%

Healthcare

10.8%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

10.3%
10.3%

Communication Services

9.8%
9.5%

Technology

9.8%
7.7%

Basic Materials

9.7%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
10.1%

Utilities

8.1%
10.2%

Financial Services

8.0%
10.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Energy

EDOG
13.5%
IDOG
9.2%

Industrials

EDOG
11.6%
IDOG
12.3%

Healthcare

EDOG
10.8%
IDOG
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

EDOG
10.3%
IDOG
10.3%

Communication Services

EDOG
9.8%
IDOG
9.5%

Technology

EDOG
9.8%
IDOG
7.7%

Basic Materials

EDOG
9.7%
IDOG
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EDOG
8.3%
IDOG
10.1%

Utilities

EDOG
8.1%
IDOG
10.2%

Financial Services

EDOG
8.0%
IDOG
10.6%

Real Estate

EDOG

-

IDOG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDOG vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EDOG
EDOG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EDOG vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDOGIDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.44

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

5.38

-3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.64

16.68

-13.04

EDOG vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOG and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDOG vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOG drawdown since its inception was -44.29%, which is greater than IDOG's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOG and IDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDOGIDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.29%

-37.32%

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.73%

-6.47%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.29%

-13.92%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.54%

-25.31%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.29%

-37.32%

-6.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.17%

-0.27%

-5.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-7.86%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

2.08%

+2.83%

Volatility

EDOG vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 2.79%. This indicates that EDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDOGIDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

2.79%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.03%

10.78%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.03%

13.36%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

15.64%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

17.09%

+0.27%

EDOG vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDOG vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

EDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than IDOG's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDOG
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.88%4.50%6.55%6.53%5.07%4.11%2.60%4.93%5.37%2.89%2.97%4.55%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.23%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDOG and IDOG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDOG has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to IDOG (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOG dropped -44.29% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

On 10-year performance, IDOG leads with 10.94% vs 5.60% for EDOG. On fees, IDOG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 10.94% return vs 5.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDOG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EDOG.

EDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 4.23% for IDOG.

EDOG is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IDOG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EDOG tracks S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EDOG and 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDOG and IDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer