EDOG vs. EMIF
EDOG (ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and EMIF (iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EDOG tracks the S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index while EMIF tracks the S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDOG returned 6.34%/yr vs 2.41%/yr for EMIF. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDOG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for EMIF.
Performance
EDOG vs. EMIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOG achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than EMIF's 1.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EDOG has outperformed EMIF with an annualized return of 6.34%, while EMIF has yielded a comparatively lower 2.41% annualized return.
EDOG
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 17.09%
- 3Y*
- 10.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.98%
- 10Y*
- 6.34%
EMIF
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- 20.42%
- 3Y*
- 11.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.64%
- 10Y*
- 2.41%
EDOG vs. EMIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 1.65% | 22.59% | 1.70% | 11.58% | -10.50% | 11.71% | 7.99% | 13.26% | -16.52% | 20.42% |
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF | 1.13% | 33.90% | 1.21% | 5.67% | -12.59% | 3.76% | -19.98% | 16.36% | -13.70% | 20.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOG and EMIF is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014 | 0.71 |
The correlation between EDOG and EMIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
EDOG vs. EMIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDOG
EMIF
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
EDOG
EMIF
Energy
EDOG
EMIF
Financial Services
EDOG
EMIF
-
Healthcare
EDOG
EMIF
-
Utilities
EDOG
EMIF
Consumer Defensive
EDOG
EMIF
-
Technology
EDOG
EMIF
-
Consumer Cyclical
EDOG
EMIF
-
Basic Materials
EDOG
EMIF
-
Communication Services
EDOG
EMIF
-
Real Estate
EDOG
-
EMIF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOG vs. EMIF — Risk / Return Rank
EDOG
EMIF
EDOG vs. EMIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDOG | EMIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 1.32 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.24 | 3.91 | +0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDOG vs. EMIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOG drawdown since its inception was -44.29%, smaller than the maximum EMIF drawdown of -48.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOG and EMIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOG | EMIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.29% | -48.02% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.73% | -15.57% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.29% | -16.70% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.54% | -23.29% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.29% | -48.02% | +3.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.54% | -12.97% | +3.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -15.90% | +4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 5.24% | -1.19% |
Volatility
EDOG vs. EMIF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) is 4.04%, while iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that EDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOG | EMIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 5.59% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.23% | 13.43% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.05% | 16.01% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 19.74% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.42% | 20.58% | -3.16% |
EDOG vs. EMIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EMIF's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOG vs. EMIF - Dividend Comparison
EDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than EMIF's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 5.06% | 4.50% | 6.55% | 6.53% | 5.07% | 4.11% | 2.60% | 4.93% | 5.37% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 4.55% |
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF | 4.18% | 4.96% | 4.12% | 2.64% | 3.08% | 3.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.64% | 2.58% | 3.16% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOG and EMIF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMIF has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to EDOG (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOG dropped -44.29% vs EMIF's -48.02%.
On 10-year performance, EDOG leads with 6.34% vs 2.41% for EMIF. On fees, EDOG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, EDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EDOG has performed better with a 6.34% return vs 2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EDOG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMIF.
EDOG has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 4.18% for EMIF.
EDOG tracks S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while EMIF tracks S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EDOG and 0.75% for EMIF.
EMIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOG and EMIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer