PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDOG vs. EDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDOG vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOG achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than EDIV's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, EDOG has underperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 6.26%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.16% annualized return.


EDOG

1D
-1.83%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
2.43%
6M
3.44%
1Y
16.67%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
4.71%
10Y*
6.26%

EDIV

1D
-1.27%
1M
2.48%
YTD
6.42%
6M
7.80%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
9.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDOG vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDOG
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
2.43%22.59%1.70%11.58%-10.50%11.71%7.99%13.26%-16.52%20.42%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
6.42%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%

Correlation

The correlation between EDOG and EDIV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2014

0.79

The correlation between EDOG and EDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDOG vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDOG
EDIV

Energy

14.0%
3.2%

Industrials

11.9%
9.7%

Communication Services

10.5%
13.8%

Healthcare

10.5%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

9.9%
12.8%

Basic Materials

9.8%
1.7%

Technology

9.2%
8.4%

Utilities

8.8%
2.5%

Financial Services

7.8%
29.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
11.8%

Real Estate

-

5.1%

Energy

EDOG
14.0%
EDIV
3.2%

Industrials

EDOG
11.9%
EDIV
9.7%

Communication Services

EDOG
10.5%
EDIV
13.8%

Healthcare

EDOG
10.5%
EDIV
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

EDOG
9.9%
EDIV
12.8%

Basic Materials

EDOG
9.8%
EDIV
1.7%

Technology

EDOG
9.2%
EDIV
8.4%

Utilities

EDOG
8.8%
EDIV
2.5%

Financial Services

EDOG
7.8%
EDIV
29.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EDOG
7.6%
EDIV
11.8%

Real Estate

EDOG

-

EDIV
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDOG vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDOG
EDOG Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDOG vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDOGEDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.37

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

4.23

+0.55

EDOG vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOG and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDOGEDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.16

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.78

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.53

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.17

+0.07

Drawdowns

EDOG vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOG drawdown since its inception was -44.29%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOG and EDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDOGEDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.29%

-53.36%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-10.36%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.29%

-13.84%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.54%

-28.32%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.29%

-40.76%

-3.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.84%

-4.07%

-4.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.22%

-19.36%

+8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

3.34%

+0.15%

Volatility

EDOG vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 4.11%. This indicates that EDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDOGEDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

4.11%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.00%

10.03%

+3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

12.19%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

13.83%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.60%

17.49%

+0.11%

EDOG vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDOG vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

EDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than EDIV's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.50%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
EDOG
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.88%4.50%6.55%6.53%5.07%4.11%2.60%4.93%5.37%2.89%2.97%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDOG and EDIV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDOG has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to EDIV (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOG dropped -44.29% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

On 10-year performance, EDIV leads with 9.16% vs 6.26% for EDOG. On fees, EDIV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 9.16% return vs 6.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDIV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EDOG.

EDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 4.50% for EDIV.

EDOG tracks S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EDOG and 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDOG and EDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer