PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDIV vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDIV vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EDIV has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 8.59%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.46% annualized return.


EDIV

1D
1.10%
1M
2.05%
6M
8.61%
YTD
9.97%
1Y
14.33%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
8.59%

XLE

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.33%
6M
22.84%
YTD
29.13%
1Y
33.24%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
22.22%
10Y*
9.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIV vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
9.97%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
29.13%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV and XLE is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2011

0.47

The correlation between EDIV and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDIV vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDIV
XLE

Financial Services

16.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%

-

Technology

7.6%

-

Industrials

6.2%

-

Communication Services

5.2%

-

Energy

3.9%
100.0%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Utilities

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

0.9%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Financial Services

EDIV
16.4%
XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

EDIV
9.4%
XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

EDIV
7.8%
XLE

-

Technology

EDIV
7.6%
XLE

-

Industrials

EDIV
6.2%
XLE

-

Communication Services

EDIV
5.2%
XLE

-

Energy

EDIV
3.9%
XLE
100.0%

Real Estate

EDIV
1.9%
XLE

-

Utilities

EDIV
1.7%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

EDIV
0.9%
XLE

-

Healthcare

EDIV
0.1%
XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDIV vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIV vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDIVXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

2.23

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.06

6.04

-1.99

EDIV vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDIV vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDIVXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.36%

-71.26%

+17.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-14.98%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-20.14%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

-26.04%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

-66.81%

+26.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-8.31%

+7.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.25%

-17.95%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

5.53%

-1.99%

Volatility

EDIV vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is 4.16%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that EDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDIVXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

7.06%

-2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

16.68%

-5.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

21.02%

-8.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

25.91%

-11.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.31%

29.58%

-12.27%

EDIV vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDIV vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than XLE's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.13%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.66%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDIV and XLE have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to EDIV (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 9.46% vs 8.59% for EDIV. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 9.46% return vs 8.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 2.66% for XLE.

EDIV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDIV and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer