PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDIV vs. VBK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDIV vs. VBK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly lower than VBK's 16.25% return. Over the past 10 years, EDIV has underperformed VBK with an annualized return of 9.49%, while VBK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.82% annualized return.


EDIV

1D
0.70%
1M
2.55%
YTD
7.76%
6M
9.12%
1Y
15.09%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
9.49%

VBK

1D
0.33%
1M
3.93%
YTD
16.25%
6M
14.67%
1Y
31.85%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*
11.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIV vs. VBK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
7.76%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
16.25%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV and VBK is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2011

0.58

The correlation between EDIV and VBK shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDIV vs. VBK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDIV
VBK

Financial Services

29.8%
5.6%

Communication Services

13.8%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

13.4%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
9.6%

Industrials

9.7%
24.7%

Technology

9.5%
25.9%

Real Estate

3.3%
3.9%

Energy

3.3%
4.8%

Utilities

2.4%
1.2%

Basic Materials

1.6%
3.2%

Healthcare

1.3%
15.3%

Financial Services

EDIV
29.8%
VBK
5.6%

Communication Services

EDIV
13.8%
VBK
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

EDIV
13.4%
VBK
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EDIV
11.9%
VBK
9.6%

Industrials

EDIV
9.7%
VBK
24.7%

Technology

EDIV
9.5%
VBK
25.9%

Real Estate

EDIV
3.3%
VBK
3.9%

Energy

EDIV
3.3%
VBK
4.8%

Utilities

EDIV
2.4%
VBK
1.2%

Basic Materials

EDIV
1.6%
VBK
3.2%

Healthcare

EDIV
1.3%
VBK
15.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDIV vs. VBK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIV vs. VBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDIVVBKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

2.62

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

9.82

-5.81

EDIV vs. VBK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the VBK Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV and VBK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDIV vs. VBK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, smaller than the maximum VBK drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and VBK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDIVVBKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.36%

-58.68%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-11.44%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-27.54%

+13.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

-38.39%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

-38.70%

-2.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-2.04%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.33%

-10.14%

-9.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

3.05%

+0.38%

Volatility

EDIV vs. VBK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is 4.64%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that EDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDIVVBKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

7.31%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

15.61%

-5.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.64%

19.96%

-7.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

23.59%

-9.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

22.92%

-5.43%

EDIV vs. VBK - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VBK's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDIV vs. VBK - Dividend Comparison

EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than VBK's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.45%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.45%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDIV and VBK have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBK has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to EDIV (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs VBK's -58.68%.

On 10-year performance, VBK leads with 11.82% vs 9.49% for EDIV. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBK has performed better with a 11.82% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 0.45% for VBK.

EDIV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VBK is Small Cap Growth Equities. EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.05% for VBK.

VBK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDIV and VBK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer