EDIV vs. ROAM
EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) and ROAM (Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EDIV tracks the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index while ROAM tracks the Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDIV returned 9.16%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for ROAM. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EDIV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for ROAM.
Performance
EDIV vs. ROAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than ROAM's 26.83% return. Over the past 10 years, EDIV has underperformed ROAM with an annualized return of 9.16%, while ROAM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.
EDIV
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 14.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
ROAM
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 26.83%
- 6M
- 28.99%
- 1Y
- 51.96%
- 3Y*
- 26.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
EDIV vs. ROAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 6.42% | 16.45% | 12.75% | 41.91% | -15.31% | 11.21% | -9.95% | 11.80% | -6.16% | 28.20% |
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 26.83% | 32.08% | 6.21% | 21.28% | -14.78% | 9.32% | 2.24% | 8.89% | -12.24% | 27.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDIV and ROAM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015 | 0.81 |
The correlation between EDIV and ROAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
EDIV vs. ROAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDIV
ROAM
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Financial Services
EDIV
ROAM
Communication Services
EDIV
ROAM
Consumer Defensive
EDIV
ROAM
Consumer Cyclical
EDIV
ROAM
Industrials
EDIV
ROAM
Technology
EDIV
ROAM
Real Estate
EDIV
ROAM
Energy
EDIV
ROAM
Utilities
EDIV
ROAM
Basic Materials
EDIV
ROAM
Healthcare
EDIV
ROAM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDIV vs. ROAM — Risk / Return Rank
EDIV
ROAM
EDIV vs. ROAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDIV | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.63 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 5.27 | -3.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.23 | 19.91 | -15.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDIV | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 3.50 | -2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.81 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.55 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.38 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
EDIV vs. ROAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than ROAM's maximum drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and ROAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDIV | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.36% | -45.47% | -7.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -9.92% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -16.79% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.32% | -27.07% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.76% | -45.47% | +4.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.07% | -1.60% | -2.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -11.13% | -8.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.62% | +0.72% |
Volatility
EDIV vs. ROAM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is 4.11%, while Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that EDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDIV | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 6.41% | -2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 12.76% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 14.93% | -2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 15.23% | -1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 17.87% | -0.38% |
EDIV vs. ROAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ROAM's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDIV vs. ROAM - Dividend Comparison
EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than ROAM's 2.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.50% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 2.50% | 3.17% | 4.15% | 5.40% | 5.23% | 4.22% | 3.04% | 3.55% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 1.89% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDIV and ROAM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROAM has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to EDIV (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs ROAM's -45.47%.
On 10-year performance, ROAM leads with 9.87% vs 9.16% for EDIV. On fees, ROAM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ROAM has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 9.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROAM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.
EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 2.50% for ROAM.
EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while ROAM tracks Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.44% for ROAM.
ROAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDIV and ROAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer