EDIV vs. BKIE
EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDIV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while BKIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDIV returned 12.20%/yr vs 9.60%/yr for BKIE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDIV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.
Performance
EDIV vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EDIV having a 9.11% return and BKIE slightly lower at 8.78%.
EDIV
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 13.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.21%
BKIE
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 5.02%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.64%
EDIV vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 9.11% | 16.45% | 12.75% | 41.91% | -15.31% | 11.21% | 23.64% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 8.78% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 13.75% | 34.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDIV and BKIE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between EDIV and BKIE shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (5 years) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EDIV vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDIV
BKIE
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Financial Services
EDIV
BKIE
Communication Services
EDIV
BKIE
Consumer Defensive
EDIV
BKIE
Consumer Cyclical
EDIV
BKIE
Technology
EDIV
BKIE
Industrials
EDIV
BKIE
Real Estate
EDIV
BKIE
Energy
EDIV
BKIE
Utilities
EDIV
BKIE
Basic Materials
EDIV
BKIE
Healthcare
EDIV
BKIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDIV vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank
EDIV
BKIE
EDIV vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDIV | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.25 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 1.89 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.70 | 7.24 | -3.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDIV vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and BKIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDIV | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.36% | -28.19% | -25.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -11.41% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -13.19% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.32% | -28.19% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -2.34% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.23% | -4.90% | -14.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 2.97% | +0.57% |
Volatility
EDIV vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) have volatilities of 3.83% and 3.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDIV | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 3.70% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 13.03% | -1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.80% | 15.22% | -2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.94% | 16.18% | -2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 16.32% | +0.98% |
EDIV vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDIV vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison
EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than BKIE's 3.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.23% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.16% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDIV and BKIE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDIV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to BKIE (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs BKIE's -28.19%.
On 5-year performance, EDIV leads with 12.20% vs 9.60% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 12.20% return vs 9.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.
EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 3.23% for BKIE.
EDIV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BKIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while BKIE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.04% for BKIE.
BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDIV and BKIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer