PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDIT vs. SHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EDIT vs. SHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIT achieves a 21.95% return, which is significantly higher than SHW's -1.61% return. Over the past 10 years, EDIT has underperformed SHW with an annualized return of -22.22%, while SHW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.58% annualized return.


EDIT

1D
2.46%
1M
-4.58%
YTD
21.95%
6M
-1.19%
1Y
26.90%
3Y*
-39.82%
5Y*
-41.79%
10Y*
-22.22%

SHW

1D
0.13%
1M
6.01%
YTD
-1.61%
6M
-3.00%
1Y
-4.65%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
13.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIT vs. SHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDIT
Editas Medicine, Inc.
21.95%61.42%-87.46%14.21%-66.59%-62.13%136.78%30.15%-25.97%89.34%
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
-1.61%-3.83%9.90%32.73%-31.96%44.90%27.05%49.70%-3.23%54.11%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIT and SHW is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2016

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EDIT:

$244.70M

SHW:

$78.72B

EPS

EDIT:

-$1.21

SHW:

$10.42

PS Ratio

EDIT:

6.29

SHW:

3.31

PB Ratio

EDIT:

55.51

SHW:

17.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

EDIT:

$35.86M

SHW:

$23.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EDIT:

$35.86M

SHW:

$11.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

EDIT:

-$76.66M

SHW:

$4.29B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDIT vs. SHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIT
EDIT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EDIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SHW
SHW Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHW Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHW Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIT vs. SHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDITSHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.95

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

-0.47

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

-0.99

+1.42

EDIT vs. SHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIT Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the SHW Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIT and SHW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDIT vs. SHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIT drawdown since its inception was -98.92%, which is greater than SHW's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIT and SHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDITSHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.92%

-52.02%

-46.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.88%

-21.36%

-38.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-91.18%

-25.69%

-65.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.66%

-42.46%

-56.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.92%

-42.46%

-56.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.24%

-19.53%

-77.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.63%

-11.63%

-51.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.03%

10.28%

+23.75%

Volatility

EDIT vs. SHW - Volatility Comparison

Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) has a higher volatility of 32.34% compared to The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) at 9.00%. This indicates that EDIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDITSHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.34%

9.00%

+23.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.63%

19.26%

+42.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

94.75%

25.46%

+69.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.12%

26.27%

+67.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.80%

26.58%

+57.22%

Dividends

EDIT vs. SHW - Dividend Comparison

EDIT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIT
Editas Medicine, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
1.00%0.98%0.84%0.78%1.01%0.62%0.73%0.77%0.87%0.83%1.25%1.03%

Financials

EDIT vs. SHW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Editas Medicine, Inc. and The Sherwin-Williams Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B202220232024202520260
5.67B
(EDIT) Total Revenue
(SHW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EDIT and SHW have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDIT has higher volatility (32.34%) compared to SHW (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIT dropped -98.92% vs SHW's -52.02%.

EDIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDIT and SHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer