EDIT vs. XLG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG).

XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 4, 2005.

Performance

EDIT vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EDIT vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDIT Editas Medicine, Inc.	27.32%	61.42%	-87.46%	14.21%	-66.59%	-62.13%	136.78%	30.15%	-25.97%	89.34%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	-7.18%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIT achieves a 27.32% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's -7.18% return. Over the past 10 years, EDIT has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of -23.27%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.72% annualized return.

EDIT

• 1D: 5.67%
• 1M: 21.40%
• YTD: 27.32%
• 6M: -26.48%
• 1Y: 130.97%
• 3Y*: -28.86%
• 5Y*: -42.85%
• 10Y*: -23.27%

XLG

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: -7.18%
• 6M: -4.55%
• 1Y: 19.62%
• 3Y*: 21.92%
• 5Y*: 13.96%
• 10Y*: 15.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EDIT vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIT

EDIT Risk / Return Rank: 77
EDIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EDIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
EDIT Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EDIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EDIT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 57
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIT vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDIT	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	0.99	+0.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	1.54	+0.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.22	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	1.63	+0.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.96	5.71	-1.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDIT vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIT and XLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDIT	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	0.99	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.46	0.75	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.28	0.84	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.21	0.59	-0.79

Correlation

The correlation between EDIT and XLG is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EDIT vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

EDIT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDIT Editas Medicine, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.70%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Drawdowns

EDIT vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIT drawdown since its inception was -98.92%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIT and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDIT	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.92%	-52.39%	-46.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.88%	-12.41%	-47.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.66%	-28.02%	-70.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.92%	-30.46%	-68.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.12%	-8.93%	-88.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.99%	-7.69%	-54.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.57%	3.54%	+28.03%

Volatility

EDIT vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) has a higher volatility of 31.43% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 5.82%. This indicates that EDIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDIT	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.43%	5.82%	+25.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.52%	10.65%	+49.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	98.25%	19.97%	+78.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.22%	18.68%	+74.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.41%	18.81%	+64.60%