PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGU vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGU vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGU achieves a 12.54% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.


EDGU

1D
-0.48%
1M
6.63%
YTD
12.54%
6M
12.90%
1Y
27.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MTUM

1D
1.06%
1M
15.90%
YTD
31.75%
6M
32.38%
1Y
41.76%
3Y*
34.75%
5Y*
15.21%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGU vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EDGU
3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF
12.54%14.79%0.27%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.75%22.15%2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGU and MTUM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024

0.86

The correlation between EDGU and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDGU vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDGU
MTUM

Technology

27.3%
44.4%

Financial Services

14.2%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
3.6%

Communication Services

11.2%
7.4%

Industrials

9.4%
15.6%

Healthcare

8.3%
6.9%

Energy

6.1%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
3.3%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.7%

Utilities

2.2%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.8%

Technology

EDGU
27.3%
MTUM
44.4%

Financial Services

EDGU
14.2%
MTUM
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EDGU
11.8%
MTUM
3.6%

Communication Services

EDGU
11.2%
MTUM
7.4%

Industrials

EDGU
9.4%
MTUM
15.6%

Healthcare

EDGU
8.3%
MTUM
6.9%

Energy

EDGU
6.1%
MTUM
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

EDGU
5.5%
MTUM
3.3%

Basic Materials

EDGU
2.3%
MTUM
1.7%

Utilities

EDGU
2.2%
MTUM
1.6%

Real Estate

EDGU
1.7%
MTUM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGU vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGU
EDGU Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EDGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGU Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGU Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGU vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDGUMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

3.64

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

14.50

+0.52

EDGU vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGU Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGU and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDGUMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.20

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.85

+0.27

Drawdowns

EDGU vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGU drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGU and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGUMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.58%

-34.08%

+16.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-11.54%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-6.21%

+3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.89%

-1.05%

Volatility

EDGU vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) is 3.31%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that EDGU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGUMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

7.68%

-4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

16.46%

-7.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.68%

19.04%

-7.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.14%

20.60%

-5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

21.03%

-5.89%

EDGU vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGU has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGU vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

EDGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDGU
3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF
0.65%0.61%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDGU and MTUM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to EDGU (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGU dropped -17.58% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 1-year performance, MTUM leads with 41.76% vs 27.51% for EDGU. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EDGU has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 41.76% return vs 27.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for EDGU.

EDGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.

EDGU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for EDGU and 0.15% for MTUM.

EDGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGU and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer