PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGU vs. CNAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGU vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGU achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 34.15% return.


EDGU

1D
-3.12%
1M
1.85%
YTD
9.10%
6M
9.12%
1Y
23.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CNAV

1D
-7.71%
1M
7.02%
YTD
34.15%
6M
33.13%
1Y
56.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGU vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EDGU
3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF
9.10%14.79%0.27%
CNAV
Mohr Company Nav ETF
34.15%16.80%6.36%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGU and CNAV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024

0.80

The correlation between EDGU and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGU vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGU
EDGU Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EDGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGU Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGU Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CNAV
CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGU vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDGUCNAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.38

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

4.38

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.18

18.41

-5.23

EDGU vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGU Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGU and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDGUCNAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.16

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

1.29

-0.33

Drawdowns

EDGU vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGU drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGU and CNAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGUCNAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.58%

-30.06%

+12.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-12.97%

+5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-8.90%

+5.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-5.42%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

3.08%

-1.23%

Volatility

EDGU vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) is 4.60%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 14.56%. This indicates that EDGU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGUCNAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

14.56%

-9.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

22.65%

-13.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

26.34%

-14.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.31%

27.80%

-12.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.31%

27.80%

-12.49%

EDGU vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGU has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGU vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

EDGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
CNAV
Mohr Company Nav ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
EDGU
3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF
0.67%0.61%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDGU and CNAV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNAV has higher volatility (14.56%) compared to EDGU (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGU dropped -17.58% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 56.50% vs 23.12% for EDGU. On fees, EDGU is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, EDGU has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 56.50% return vs 23.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDGU is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

EDGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for EDGU and 1.31% for CNAV.

CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGU and CNAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer