PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGU vs. EDGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGU vs. EDGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) and 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGU achieves a 13.08% return, which is significantly higher than EDGF's 0.95% return.


EDGU

1D
0.53%
1M
6.61%
YTD
13.08%
6M
14.00%
1Y
28.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EDGF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.95%
6M
1.08%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGU vs. EDGF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EDGU
3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF
13.08%14.79%0.27%
EDGF
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
0.95%4.36%-1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGU and EDGF is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024

0.12

EDGU vs. EDGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDGU
EDGF

Technology

27.3%

-

Financial Services

14.2%
99.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%

-

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Industrials

9.4%

-

Healthcare

8.3%

-

Energy

6.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.5%

-

Basic Materials

2.3%

-

Utilities

2.2%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Technology

EDGU
27.3%
EDGF

-

Financial Services

EDGU
14.2%
EDGF
99.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EDGU
11.8%
EDGF

-

Communication Services

EDGU
11.2%
EDGF

-

Industrials

EDGU
9.4%
EDGF

-

Healthcare

EDGU
8.3%
EDGF

-

Energy

EDGU
6.1%
EDGF

-

Consumer Defensive

EDGU
5.5%
EDGF

-

Basic Materials

EDGU
2.3%
EDGF

-

Utilities

EDGU
2.2%
EDGF

-

Real Estate

EDGU
1.7%
EDGF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGU vs. EDGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGU
EDGU Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EDGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGU Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGU Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

EDGF
EDGF Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
EDGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGF Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGF Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGU vs. EDGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) and 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDGUEDGFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

1.81

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.33

2.87

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

5.19

-1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.86

13.35

+2.50

EDGU vs. EDGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGU Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the EDGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGU and EDGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDGUEDGFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.81

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.99

+0.16

Drawdowns

EDGU vs. EDGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGU drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, which is greater than EDGF's maximum drawdown of -1.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGU and EDGF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGUEDGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.58%

-1.62%

-15.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-0.64%

-6.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.03%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-0.46%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

0.25%

+1.59%

Volatility

EDGU vs. EDGF - Volatility Comparison

3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) at 0.27%. This indicates that EDGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGUEDGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

0.27%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

1.28%

+7.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

1.95%

+9.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

2.35%

+12.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

2.35%

+12.81%

EDGU vs. EDGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGU has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than EDGF's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGU vs. EDGF - Dividend Comparison

EDGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than EDGF's 3.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EDGF
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
3.45%3.61%0.49%
EDGU
3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF
0.65%0.61%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDGU and EDGF have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDGU has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to EDGF (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGU dropped -17.58% vs EDGF's -1.62%.

On 1-year performance, EDGU leads with 28.86% vs 3.51% for EDGF. On fees, EDGF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, EDGF has been the lower-risk option at 0.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EDGU has performed better with a 28.86% return vs 3.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDGF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for EDGU.

EDGF has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 0.65% for EDGU.

EDGU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EDGF is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for EDGU and 0.79% for EDGF.

EDGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGU and EDGF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer