EDGU vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EDGU (3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EDGU returned 27.51% vs 13.85% for BDGS. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDGU charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

EDGU vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGU achieves a 12.54% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 5.64% return.

EDGU

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 6.63%
• YTD: 12.54%
• 6M: 12.90%
• 1Y: 27.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 5.64%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 13.85%
• 3Y*: 14.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGU vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EDGU 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF	12.54%	14.79%	0.27%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	5.64%	10.61%	5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGU and BDGS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024	0.79

The correlation between EDGU and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDGU vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDGU	BDGS
Technology	27.3%	37.4%
Financial Services	14.2%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.8%	10.9%
Communication Services	11.2%	16.6%
Industrials	9.4%	6.6%
Healthcare	8.3%	7.5%
Energy	6.1%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	4.1%
Basic Materials	2.3%	1.5%
Utilities	2.2%	1.9%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.5%

Return for Risk

EDGU vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGU

EDGU Risk / Return Rank: 75
EDGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
EDGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
EDGU Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EDGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EDGU Martin Ratio Rank: 79

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 74
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGU vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDGU	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.29	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	3.40	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.47	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.90	3.45	+0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.02	16.47	-1.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDGU vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGU Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGU and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDGU	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	2.29	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	1.76	-0.64

Drawdowns

EDGU vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGU drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGU and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDGU	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.58%	-9.12%	-8.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.08%	-4.03%	-3.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-0.83%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-0.64%	-1.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	0.84%	+1.00%

Volatility

EDGU vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.14%. This indicates that EDGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDGU	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	1.14%	+2.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.54%	4.74%	+3.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.68%	6.08%	+5.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.14%	8.21%	+6.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.14%	8.21%	+6.93%

EDGU vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGU has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDGU vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

EDGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than BDGS's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.52%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
EDGU 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF	0.65%	0.61%	0.15%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDGU and BDGS in my portfolio?

EDGU and BDGS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDGU or BDGS?

EDGU has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to BDGS (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGU dropped -17.58% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, EDGU or BDGS?

On 1-year performance, EDGU leads with 27.51% vs 13.85% for BDGS. On fees, BDGS is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDGU or BDGS?

Over the 1-year period, EDGU has performed better with a 27.51% return vs 13.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDGU or BDGS?

BDGS is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for EDGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDGU or BDGS?

EDGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.52% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between EDGU and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for EDGU and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.