EDGQ vs. BUCK
EDGQ (Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDGQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDGQ charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
EDGQ vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EDGQ
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUCK
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 7.46%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDGQ vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 19.41% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDGQ and BUCK is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDGQ vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
EDGQ
BUCK
EDGQ vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDGQ | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.23 | 1.48 | +3.75 |
Drawdowns
EDGQ vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDGQ drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGQ and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDGQ | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -5.43% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -0.49% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility
EDGQ vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDGQ | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.97% | 3.14% | +12.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 3.48% | +12.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 3.48% | +12.49% |
EDGQ vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDGQ vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than BUCK's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.41% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDGQ and BUCK have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EDGQ.
BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 3.36% for EDGQ.
EDGQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 0.35% for BUCK.
Find the right allocation for EDGQ and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer