PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDD vs. XFLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDD vs. XFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDD achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly higher than XFLT's -19.74% return.


EDD

1D
1.38%
1M
9.18%
6M
10.30%
YTD
15.59%
1Y
26.28%
3Y*
18.24%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
5.89%

XFLT

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.08%
6M
-18.89%
YTD
-19.74%
1Y
-25.90%
3Y*
-5.63%
5Y*
-5.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDD vs. XFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
15.59%32.46%8.64%14.09%-14.15%-7.03%-2.84%25.45%-14.09%-2.34%
XFLT
XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust
-19.74%-15.35%7.37%30.40%-20.30%31.30%5.13%22.05%-15.10%-4.70%

Correlation

The correlation between EDD and XFLT is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDD vs. XFLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDD
EDD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
EDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDD Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

XFLT
XFLT Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
XFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDD vs. XFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDDXFLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.78

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

-0.64

+2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.79

-1.22

+6.01

EDD vs. XFLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the XFLT Sharpe Ratio of -1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDD and XFLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDD vs. XFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDD drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, which is greater than XFLT's maximum drawdown of -55.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDD and XFLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDDXFLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.38%

-55.43%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.67%

-40.67%

+23.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.67%

-47.04%

+29.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.04%

-47.04%

+15.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-36.18%

+35.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.12%

-14.63%

-9.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

21.28%

-15.78%

Volatility

EDD vs. XFLT - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) at 3.66%. This indicates that EDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDDXFLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

3.66%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.36%

18.09%

-4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.72%

20.57%

-3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.49%

20.89%

-5.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

26.05%

-8.40%

Dividends

EDD vs. XFLT - Dividend Comparison

EDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.75%, less than XFLT's 20.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
10.75%9.76%11.45%7.30%6.82%6.93%6.92%8.15%9.90%8.18%10.32%12.65%
XFLT
XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust
20.74%18.23%15.24%13.61%13.86%9.82%10.64%10.63%11.33%1.47%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDD and XFLT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDD has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to XFLT (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDD dropped -59.38% vs XFLT's -55.43%.

EDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDD and XFLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer