EDD vs. XFLT
EDD (Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Morgan Stanley, while XFLT (XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, EDD returned 5.85%/yr vs -4.22%/yr for XFLT. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EDD vs. XFLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDD achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly higher than XFLT's -18.19% return.
EDD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 19.08%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.85%
- 10Y*
- 5.09%
XFLT
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- -18.19%
- 6M
- -13.88%
- 1Y
- -24.87%
- 3Y*
- -4.26%
- 5Y*
- -4.22%
- 10Y*
- —
EDD vs. XFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | 3.21% | 32.46% | 8.64% | 14.09% | -14.15% | -7.03% | -2.84% | 25.45% | -14.09% | -1.50% |
XFLT XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust | -18.19% | -15.35% | 7.37% | 30.40% | -20.30% | 31.30% | 5.13% | 22.05% | -15.10% | -5.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDD and XFLT is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDD vs. XFLT — Risk / Return Rank
EDD
XFLT
EDD vs. XFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDD | XFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.79 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | -0.61 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.64 | -1.31 | +4.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDD | XFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | -1.22 | +2.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | -0.20 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.02 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
EDD vs. XFLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDD drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, which is greater than XFLT's maximum drawdown of -55.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDD and XFLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDD | XFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.38% | -55.43% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.67% | -40.67% | +23.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.67% | -47.04% | +29.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.04% | -47.04% | +15.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.17% | -34.95% | +25.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.23% | -14.37% | -9.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.26% | 19.08% | -13.82% |
Volatility
EDD vs. XFLT - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) at 3.40%. This indicates that EDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDD | XFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.70% | 3.40% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.02% | 18.32% | -5.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 20.42% | -4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 21.10% | -5.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 26.18% | -8.46% |
Dividends
EDD vs. XFLT - Dividend Comparison
EDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, less than XFLT's 20.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | 9.36% | 9.76% | 11.45% | 7.30% | 6.82% | 6.93% | 6.92% | 8.15% | 9.90% | 8.18% | 10.32% | 12.65% |
XFLT XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust | 20.78% | 18.23% | 15.24% | 13.61% | 13.86% | 9.82% | 10.64% | 10.63% | 11.33% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDD and XFLT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDD has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to XFLT (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDD dropped -59.38% vs XFLT's -55.43%.
EDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDD and XFLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer