PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDD vs. XFLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDD vs. XFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDD achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly higher than XFLT's -18.19% return.


EDD

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
3.21%
6M
2.44%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
5.09%

XFLT

1D
-1.03%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
-18.19%
6M
-13.88%
1Y
-24.87%
3Y*
-4.26%
5Y*
-4.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDD vs. XFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
3.21%32.46%8.64%14.09%-14.15%-7.03%-2.84%25.45%-14.09%-1.50%
XFLT
XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust
-18.19%-15.35%7.37%30.40%-20.30%31.30%5.13%22.05%-15.10%-5.55%

Correlation

The correlation between EDD and XFLT is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDD vs. XFLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDD
EDD Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
EDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDD Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
EDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDD Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

XFLT
XFLT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
XFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDD vs. XFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDDXFLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.79

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

-0.61

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.64

-1.31

+4.94

EDD vs. XFLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the XFLT Sharpe Ratio of -1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDD and XFLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDDXFLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

-1.22

+2.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

-0.20

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.02

+0.09

Drawdowns

EDD vs. XFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDD drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, which is greater than XFLT's maximum drawdown of -55.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDD and XFLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDDXFLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.38%

-55.43%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.67%

-40.67%

+23.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.67%

-47.04%

+29.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.04%

-47.04%

+15.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.17%

-34.95%

+25.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.23%

-14.37%

-9.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.26%

19.08%

-13.82%

Volatility

EDD vs. XFLT - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) at 3.40%. This indicates that EDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDDXFLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

3.40%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

18.32%

-5.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.12%

20.42%

-4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

21.10%

-5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.72%

26.18%

-8.46%

Dividends

EDD vs. XFLT - Dividend Comparison

EDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, less than XFLT's 20.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
9.36%9.76%11.45%7.30%6.82%6.93%6.92%8.15%9.90%8.18%10.32%12.65%
XFLT
XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust
20.78%18.23%15.24%13.61%13.86%9.82%10.64%10.63%11.33%1.47%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDD and XFLT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDD has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to XFLT (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDD dropped -59.38% vs XFLT's -55.43%.

EDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDD and XFLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer