PortfoliosLab logo
XFLT vs. BGR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between XFLT and BGR is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

XFLT vs. BGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) and BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XFLT:

-0.44

BGR:

0.16

Sortino Ratio

XFLT:

-0.45

BGR:

0.38

Omega Ratio

XFLT:

0.92

BGR:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

XFLT:

-0.31

BGR:

0.22

Martin Ratio

XFLT:

-0.95

BGR:

0.81

Ulcer Index

XFLT:

7.43%

BGR:

4.88%

Daily Std Dev

XFLT:

16.41%

BGR:

20.46%

Max Drawdown

XFLT:

-55.42%

BGR:

-72.56%

Current Drawdown

XFLT:

-14.88%

BGR:

-6.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XFLT:

$435.39M

BGR:

$332.89M

EPS

XFLT:

$1.01

BGR:

$0.48

PE Ratio

XFLT:

5.66

BGR:

26.56

PS Ratio

XFLT:

6.80

BGR:

24.94

PB Ratio

XFLT:

0.86

BGR:

0.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

XFLT:

$45.00M

BGR:

$34.81M

Gross Profit (TTM)

XFLT:

$37.80M

BGR:

$32.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

XFLT:

$22.13M

BGR:

$14.11M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFLT achieves a -9.38% return, which is significantly lower than BGR's 4.22% return.


XFLT

YTD

-9.38%

1M

8.27%

6M

-11.86%

1Y

-7.18%

5Y*

17.58%

10Y*

N/A

BGR

YTD

4.22%

1M

10.06%

6M

-1.96%

1Y

3.19%

5Y*

20.89%

10Y*

2.17%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XFLT vs. BGR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFLT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XFLT is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XFLT is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XFLT is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XFLT is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XFLT is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XFLT is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

BGR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BGR is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BGR is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BGR is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BGR is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BGR is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BGR is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XFLT vs. BGR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) and BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current XFLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the BGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFLT and BGR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

XFLT vs. BGR - Dividend Comparison

XFLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.13%, more than BGR's 7.57% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XFLT
XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust
17.13%15.24%13.61%13.86%9.82%10.64%10.63%11.33%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BGR
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust
7.57%6.66%6.22%4.62%4.75%9.26%7.84%8.91%6.57%6.90%11.93%13.83%

Drawdowns

XFLT vs. BGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFLT drawdown since its inception was -55.42%, smaller than the maximum BGR drawdown of -72.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFLT and BGR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

XFLT vs. BGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) is 4.45%, while BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that XFLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

XFLT vs. BGR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust and BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M20212022202320242025
45.00M
10.63M
(XFLT) Total Revenue
(BGR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items