PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFLT vs. PFLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XFLT vs. PFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFLT achieves a -13.70% return, which is significantly higher than PFLT's -18.83% return.


XFLT

1D
-0.48%
1M
7.09%
6M
-8.91%
YTD
-13.70%
1Y
-20.33%
3Y*
-4.28%
5Y*
-3.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.20%

PFLT

1D
-1.00%
1M
-6.17%
6M
-21.14%
YTD
-18.83%
1Y
-23.65%
3Y*
-4.27%
5Y*
-1.47%
10Y*
4.35%
ALL TIME*
4.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.63M$9.40M$9.33M
$2.03M$1.89M$1.66M

XFLT vs. PFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XFLT
XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust
-13.70%-15.35%7.37%30.40%-20.30%31.30%5.13%22.05%-15.10%-4.70%
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
-18.83%-4.17%0.62%23.05%-5.53%32.64%-1.41%15.52%-8.29%-2.90%

Correlation

The correlation between XFLT and PFLT is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XFLT:

$286.49M

PFLT:

$688.57M

EPS

XFLT:

-$3.38

PFLT:

$1.79

PS Ratio

XFLT:

2.24

PFLT:

2.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

XFLT:

$127.88M

PFLT:

$229.78M

Gross Profit (TTM)

XFLT:

$65.98M

PFLT:

$45.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

XFLT:

-$14.78M

PFLT:

$38.59M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XFLT vs. PFLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XFLT
XFLT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
XFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PFLT
PFLT Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XFLT vs. PFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XFLTPFLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.83

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

-0.96

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.93

-1.97

+1.04

XFLT vs. PFLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is comparable to the PFLT Sharpe Ratio of -1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFLT and PFLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XFLT vs. PFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFLT drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, smaller than the maximum PFLT drawdown of -69.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFLT and PFLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XFLTPFLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.43%

-69.77%

+14.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.67%

-25.25%

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.04%

-28.44%

-18.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.04%

-29.64%

-17.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.38%

-27.61%

-3.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.75%

-8.46%

-6.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.13%

12.29%

+9.84%

Volatility

XFLT vs. PFLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) is 6.27%, while PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that XFLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XFLTPFLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

6.65%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.99%

18.40%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

22.03%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

21.45%

-0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.06%

29.09%

-3.03%

Dividends

XFLT vs. PFLT - Dividend Comparison

XFLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.87%, more than PFLT's 17.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
17.12%13.27%11.25%9.98%10.38%8.93%10.83%9.24%9.59%8.31%8.08%10.04%
XFLT
XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust
18.87%18.23%15.24%13.61%13.86%9.82%10.64%10.63%11.33%1.47%0.00%0.00%

Financials

XFLT vs. PFLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


XFLT and PFLT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFLT has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to XFLT (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFLT dropped -55.43% vs PFLT's -69.77%.

XFLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.96 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFLT and PFLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer