PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDC vs. NBIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EDC vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EDC vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 9.01% return.


EDC

1D
-3.10%
1M
-12.56%
YTD
2.22%
6M
5.39%
1Y
81.15%
3Y*
24.50%
5Y*
-9.45%
10Y*
2.50%

NBIG

1D
-3.97%
1M
10.38%
YTD
9.01%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EDC vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EDC vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDC
EDC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

NBIG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDC vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDCNBIGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.48

EDC vs. NBIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDCNBIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

-0.44

+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between EDC and NBIG is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EDC vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
1.67%1.79%3.94%3.54%0.00%0.18%0.44%0.97%0.78%0.25%
NBIG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EDC vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than NBIG's maximum drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and NBIG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EDCNBIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.54%

-75.83%

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.30%

-62.63%

-15.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.33%

-53.63%

-11.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.92%

Volatility

EDC vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EDCNBIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.34%

198.26%

-137.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.21%

198.26%

-143.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.12%

198.26%

-138.14%