PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDC vs. EURL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDC vs. EURL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares (EURL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 82.36% return, which is significantly higher than EURL's 8.29% return. Over the past 10 years, EDC has outperformed EURL with an annualized return of 8.70%, while EURL has yielded a comparatively lower 8.24% annualized return.


EDC

1D
-3.74%
1M
26.16%
YTD
82.36%
6M
92.21%
1Y
200.25%
3Y*
52.64%
5Y*
-0.27%
10Y*
8.70%

EURL

1D
-3.47%
1M
7.25%
YTD
8.29%
6M
16.12%
1Y
37.91%
3Y*
30.36%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
8.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDC vs. EURL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
82.36%94.58%-2.00%7.48%-60.25%-20.81%6.49%43.92%-49.87%138.61%
EURL
Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares
8.29%105.85%-11.42%44.19%-54.41%46.59%-23.19%72.61%-46.39%91.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EDC and EURL is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2014

0.73

The correlation between EDC and EURL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDC vs. EURL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDC
EURL

Technology

32.7%
7.9%

Financial Services

20.8%
23.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
7.2%

Communication Services

7.8%
3.3%

Industrials

7.3%
19.8%

Basic Materials

7.0%
5.5%

Energy

4.4%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
8.2%

Healthcare

3.2%
13.2%

Utilities

2.2%
4.8%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.6%

Technology

EDC
32.7%
EURL
7.9%

Financial Services

EDC
20.8%
EURL
23.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EDC
10.3%
EURL
7.2%

Communication Services

EDC
7.8%
EURL
3.3%

Industrials

EDC
7.3%
EURL
19.8%

Basic Materials

EDC
7.0%
EURL
5.5%

Energy

EDC
4.4%
EURL
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

EDC
3.2%
EURL
8.2%

Healthcare

EDC
3.2%
EURL
13.2%

Utilities

EDC
2.2%
EURL
4.8%

Real Estate

EDC
1.1%
EURL
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDC vs. EURL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDC
EDC Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

EURL
EURL Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
EURL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EURL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EURL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EURL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EURL Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDC vs. EURL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares (EURL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDCEURLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.17

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.31

1.15

+4.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.68

3.68

+15.00

EDC vs. EURL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDC Sharpe Ratio is 3.38, which is higher than the EURL Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDC and EURL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDCEURLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38

0.82

+2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.09

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

0.15

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.04

+0.01

Drawdowns

EDC vs. EURL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than EURL's maximum drawdown of -84.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and EURL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDCEURLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.54%

-84.65%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.98%

-33.05%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.48%

-38.81%

-10.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.99%

-75.24%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.01%

-84.65%

-2.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.29%

-13.12%

-48.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.36%

-36.98%

-28.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.77%

10.33%

+0.44%

Volatility

EDC vs. EURL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a higher volatility of 25.80% compared to Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares (EURL) at 16.61%. This indicates that EDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EURL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDCEURLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.80%

16.61%

+9.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.94%

38.49%

+13.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.67%

46.27%

+13.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.68%

53.24%

+3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.69%

55.80%

+4.89%

EDC vs. EURL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than EURL's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDC vs. EURL - Dividend Comparison

EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than EURL's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
0.93%1.79%3.94%3.54%0.00%0.18%0.44%0.97%0.78%0.25%
EURL
Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares
1.44%1.50%3.51%2.50%1.80%0.33%0.41%1.17%3.07%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDC and EURL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDC has higher volatility (25.80%) compared to EURL (16.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDC dropped -92.54% vs EURL's -84.65%.

On 10-year performance, EDC leads with 8.70% vs 8.24% for EURL. On fees, EURL is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, EURL has been the lower-risk option at 16.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EDC has performed better with a 8.70% return vs 8.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EURL is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.

EURL has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.93% for EDC.

EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while EURL tracks FTSE Developed Europe Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.33% for EDC and 1.07% for EURL.

EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDC and EURL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer