EDC vs. DRN
EDC (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares) and DRN (Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - EDC is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while DRN is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US REIT Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDC returned 8.38%/yr vs -3.96%/yr for DRN. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDC charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for DRN.
Performance
EDC vs. DRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 62.45% return, which is significantly higher than DRN's 34.24% return. Over the past 10 years, EDC has outperformed DRN with an annualized return of 8.38%, while DRN has yielded a comparatively lower -3.96% annualized return.
EDC
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- 62.45%
- 6M
- 72.90%
- 1Y
- 137.10%
- 3Y*
- 43.12%
- 5Y*
- -2.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
DRN
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 34.24%
- 6M
- 33.93%
- 1Y
- 16.41%
- 3Y*
- 10.01%
- 5Y*
- -10.77%
- 10Y*
- -3.96%
EDC vs. DRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares | 62.45% | 94.58% | -2.00% | 7.48% | -60.25% | -20.81% | 6.49% | 43.92% | -49.87% | 138.61% |
DRN Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares | 34.24% | -11.24% | -5.29% | 12.03% | -67.26% | 152.94% | -55.37% | 81.86% | -25.11% | 7.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDC and DRN is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2009 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EDC and DRN has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
EDC vs. DRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDC
DRN
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Technology
EDC
DRN
-
Financial Services
EDC
DRN
-
Consumer Cyclical
EDC
DRN
-
Communication Services
EDC
DRN
-
Industrials
EDC
DRN
-
Basic Materials
EDC
DRN
Energy
EDC
DRN
-
Consumer Defensive
EDC
DRN
-
Healthcare
EDC
DRN
-
Utilities
EDC
DRN
-
Real Estate
EDC
DRN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDC vs. DRN — Risk / Return Rank
EDC
DRN
EDC vs. DRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDC | DRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.10 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 0.68 | +2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 1.51 | +10.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDC vs. DRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than DRN's maximum drawdown of -86.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and DRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDC | DRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.54% | -86.32% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.98% | -24.28% | -13.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.48% | -48.26% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.70% | -80.58% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.01% | -86.32% | -0.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.52% | -61.73% | -3.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.35% | -35.11% | -30.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.25% | 10.92% | +0.33% |
Volatility
EDC vs. DRN - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a higher volatility of 33.39% compared to Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) at 14.29%. This indicates that EDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDC | DRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.39% | 14.29% | +19.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.40% | 30.42% | +27.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.72% | 41.19% | +23.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.74% | 56.78% | +0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.12% | 60.68% | +0.44% |
EDC vs. DRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than DRN's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDC vs. DRN - Dividend Comparison
EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than DRN's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRN Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares | 1.98% | 2.81% | 2.24% | 2.84% | 2.70% | 4.21% | 1.90% | 2.59% | 3.11% | 0.91% |
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares | 1.05% | 1.79% | 3.94% | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 0.97% | 0.78% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDC and DRN have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDC has higher volatility (33.39%) compared to DRN (14.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDC dropped -92.54% vs DRN's -86.32%.
On 10-year performance, EDC leads with 8.38% vs -3.96% for DRN. On fees, DRN is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, DRN has been the lower-risk option at 14.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EDC has performed better with a 8.38% return vs -3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DRN is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.
DRN has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.05% for EDC.
EDC is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DRN is REIT. EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while DRN tracks MSCI US REIT Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.33% for EDC and 0.99% for DRN.
EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDC and DRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer