PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDC vs. BRZU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDC vs. BRZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 62.45% return, which is significantly higher than BRZU's 14.47% return. Over the past 10 years, EDC has outperformed BRZU with an annualized return of 8.38%, while BRZU has yielded a comparatively lower -15.10% annualized return.


EDC

1D
1.22%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
62.45%
6M
72.90%
1Y
137.10%
3Y*
43.12%
5Y*
-2.02%
10Y*
8.38%

BRZU

1D
1.74%
1M
-9.87%
YTD
14.47%
6M
11.16%
1Y
53.22%
3Y*
6.31%
5Y*
-2.87%
10Y*
-15.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDC vs. BRZU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
62.45%94.58%-2.00%7.48%-60.25%-20.81%6.49%43.92%-49.87%138.61%
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
14.47%97.99%-57.07%55.48%8.30%-39.23%-91.34%57.02%-37.21%30.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EDC and BRZU is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2013

0.64

The correlation between EDC and BRZU shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (5 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDC vs. BRZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDC
BRZU

Technology

32.7%
0.9%

Financial Services

20.8%
32.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
1.5%

Communication Services

7.8%
2.2%

Industrials

7.3%
10.9%

Basic Materials

7.0%
13.7%

Energy

4.4%
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
4.2%

Healthcare

3.2%
2.4%

Utilities

2.2%
12.8%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Technology

EDC
32.7%
BRZU
0.9%

Financial Services

EDC
20.8%
BRZU
32.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EDC
10.3%
BRZU
1.5%

Communication Services

EDC
7.8%
BRZU
2.2%

Industrials

EDC
7.3%
BRZU
10.9%

Basic Materials

EDC
7.0%
BRZU
13.7%

Energy

EDC
4.4%
BRZU
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

EDC
3.2%
BRZU
4.2%

Healthcare

EDC
3.2%
BRZU
2.4%

Utilities

EDC
2.2%
BRZU
12.8%

Real Estate

EDC
1.1%
BRZU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDC vs. BRZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDC
EDC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BRZU
BRZU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BRZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BRZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRZU Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDC vs. BRZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDCBRZUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.20

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

1.49

+2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.25

4.43

+7.82

EDC vs. BRZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDC Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the BRZU Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDC and BRZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDC vs. BRZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, smaller than the maximum BRZU drawdown of -99.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and BRZU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDCBRZUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.54%

-99.71%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.98%

-35.97%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.48%

-58.25%

+8.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.70%

-65.00%

-15.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.01%

-98.11%

+11.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.52%

-99.18%

+33.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.35%

-89.55%

+24.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.25%

12.06%

-0.81%

Volatility

EDC vs. BRZU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a higher volatility of 33.39% compared to Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) at 14.76%. This indicates that EDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDCBRZUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.39%

14.76%

+18.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.40%

39.95%

+18.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.72%

50.10%

+14.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.74%

55.45%

+2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.12%

82.91%

-21.79%

EDC vs. BRZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than BRZU's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDC vs. BRZU - Dividend Comparison

EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than BRZU's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
2.33%2.39%8.73%3.24%4.70%6.29%0.78%0.95%1.04%0.74%
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
1.05%1.79%3.94%3.54%0.00%0.18%0.44%0.97%0.78%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDC and BRZU have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDC has higher volatility (33.39%) compared to BRZU (14.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDC dropped -92.54% vs BRZU's -99.71%.

On 10-year performance, EDC leads with 8.38% vs -15.10% for BRZU. On fees, BRZU is cheaper at 1.29% per year. On volatility, BRZU has been the lower-risk option at 14.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EDC has performed better with a 8.38% return vs -15.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BRZU is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.

BRZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.05% for EDC.

EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while BRZU tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for EDC and 1.29% for BRZU.

EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDC and BRZU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer