ED vs. CRM
ED (Consolidated Edison, Inc.) and CRM (Salesforce, Inc.) are both stocks. ED operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while CRM operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ED returned 7.01%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for CRM. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ED vs. CRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ED achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -37.06% return. Over the past 10 years, ED has underperformed CRM with an annualized return of 7.01%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively higher 7.60% annualized return.
ED
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 7.08%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.01%
CRM
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- YTD
- -37.06%
- 6M
- -36.31%
- 1Y
- -35.16%
- 3Y*
- -6.88%
- 5Y*
- -6.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
ED vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 10.24% | 15.15% | 1.55% | -1.12% | 15.65% | 22.96% | -16.99% | 22.54% | -6.62% | 19.30% |
CRM Salesforce, Inc. | -37.06% | -20.25% | 27.76% | 98.46% | -47.83% | 14.20% | 36.82% | 18.74% | 33.98% | 49.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between ED and CRM is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2004 | 0.10 |
The correlation between ED and CRM shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ED:
$39.26B
CRM:
$144.49B
ED:
$5.94
CRM:
$8.59
ED:
18.13
CRM:
19.31
ED:
1.29
CRM:
0.04
ED:
2.27
CRM:
3.62
ED:
1.67
CRM:
4.22
ED:
$17.22B
CRM:
$42.83B
ED:
$11.62B
CRM:
$33.25B
ED:
$8.47B
CRM:
$12.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ED vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank
ED
CRM
ED vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ED | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.84 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | -0.95 | +1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | -1.78 | +3.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ED vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ED drawdown since its inception was -78.90%, which is greater than CRM's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ED and CRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ED | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.90% | -70.50% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -39.36% | +29.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.36% | -54.70% | +37.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.03% | -58.62% | +36.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.91% | -58.62% | +27.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -54.33% | +48.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -16.15% | +2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | 20.92% | -16.33% |
Volatility
ED vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) is 5.98%, while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 16.76%. This indicates that ED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ED | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 16.76% | -10.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.27% | 31.59% | -19.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.65% | 38.09% | -21.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 37.07% | -18.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.01% | 35.38% | -14.37% |
Dividends
ED vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison
ED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than CRM's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 1.28% | 0.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 3.23% | 3.42% | 3.72% | 3.56% | 3.32% | 3.63% | 4.23% | 3.27% | 3.74% | 3.25% | 3.64% | 4.05% |
Financials
ED vs. CRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Consolidated Edison, Inc. and Salesforce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ED vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison
ED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.15B and revenue of 5.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.5%.
CRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.
ED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
CRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.
ED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a net income of 924.00M and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in a net margin of 18.1%.
CRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ED and CRM have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRM has higher volatility (16.76%) compared to ED (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ED dropped -78.90% vs CRM's -70.50%.
ED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ED and CRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer