ED vs. BGS
ED (Consolidated Edison, Inc.) and BGS (B&G Foods, Inc.) are both stocks. ED operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while BGS operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, ED returned 7.01%/yr vs -14.86%/yr for BGS. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ED vs. BGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ED achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than BGS's -2.65% return. Over the past 10 years, ED has outperformed BGS with an annualized return of 7.01%, while BGS has yielded a comparatively lower -14.86% annualized return.
ED
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 7.08%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.01%
BGS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- -2.65%
- 6M
- -8.58%
- 1Y
- 9.87%
- 3Y*
- -25.46%
- 5Y*
- -27.79%
- 10Y*
- -14.86%
ED vs. BGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 10.24% | 15.15% | 1.55% | -1.12% | 15.65% | 22.96% | -16.99% | 22.54% | -6.62% | 19.30% |
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | -2.65% | -26.81% | -28.30% | 0.33% | -60.70% | 17.69% | 67.73% | -31.93% | -12.20% | -15.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ED and BGS is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2007 | 0.23 |
The correlation between ED and BGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ED:
$39.26B
BGS:
$323.22M
ED:
$5.94
BGS:
-$0.96
ED:
2.27
BGS:
0.18
ED:
1.67
BGS:
0.80
ED:
$17.22B
BGS:
$1.81B
ED:
$11.62B
BGS:
$388.44M
ED:
$8.47B
BGS:
$91.70M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ED vs. BGS — Risk / Return Rank
ED
BGS
ED vs. BGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) and B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ED | BGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.07 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 0.16 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | 0.47 | +1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ED vs. BGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ED drawdown since its inception was -78.90%, smaller than the maximum BGS drawdown of -86.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ED and BGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ED | BGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.90% | -86.50% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -33.11% | +23.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.36% | -67.36% | +50.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.03% | -84.68% | +62.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.91% | -86.50% | +55.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -83.99% | +78.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -32.06% | +18.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | 11.32% | -6.73% |
Volatility
ED vs. BGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) is 5.98%, while B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) has a volatility of 9.65%. This indicates that ED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ED | BGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 9.65% | -3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.27% | 33.85% | -21.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.65% | 51.42% | -34.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 49.32% | -30.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.01% | 46.31% | -25.30% |
Dividends
ED vs. BGS - Dividend Comparison
ED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than BGS's 18.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | 18.86% | 17.67% | 11.03% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% |
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 3.23% | 3.42% | 3.72% | 3.56% | 3.32% | 3.63% | 4.23% | 3.27% | 3.74% | 3.25% | 3.64% | 4.05% |
Financials
ED vs. BGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Consolidated Edison, Inc. and B&G Foods, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ED vs. BGS - Profitability Comparison
ED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.15B and revenue of 5.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.5%.
BGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.89M and revenue of 408.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.5%.
ED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
BGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.96M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.7%.
ED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a net income of 924.00M and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in a net margin of 18.1%.
BGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a net income of -32.54M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in a net margin of -8.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ED and BGS have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGS has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to ED (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ED dropped -78.90% vs BGS's -86.50%.
ED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ED and BGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer