PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECON vs. MUST
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ECON vs. MUST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ECON vs. MUST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ECON
Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF
5.16%34.15%0.22%7.51%-16.00%-14.11%20.83%17.22%1.79%
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
0.02%4.92%0.37%6.23%-8.82%1.93%6.67%8.35%2.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECON achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly higher than MUST's 0.02% return.


ECON

1D
3.72%
1M
-9.41%
YTD
5.16%
6M
10.37%
1Y
34.32%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
3.59%

MUST

1D
0.34%
1M
-2.40%
YTD
0.02%
6M
1.52%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ECON vs. MUST - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECON has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MUST's 0.23% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ECON vs. MUST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECON
ECON Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ECON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECON Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECON Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ECON Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECON Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MUST
MUST Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MUST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUST Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUST Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MUST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUST Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECON vs. MUST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECONMUSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

0.81

+0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.30

1.10

+1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.16

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

1.17

+1.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.33

4.26

+5.07

ECON vs. MUST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECON Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the MUST Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECON and MUST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECONMUSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

0.81

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.15

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.51

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between ECON and MUST is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ECON vs. MUST - Dividend Comparison

ECON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than MUST's 3.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECON
Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF
1.68%1.77%0.76%1.57%2.06%1.08%0.63%1.68%0.98%0.35%0.74%1.10%
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
3.29%3.28%3.13%2.51%1.76%1.62%2.33%2.70%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ECON vs. MUST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECON drawdown since its inception was -45.37%, which is greater than MUST's maximum drawdown of -13.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECON and MUST.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ECONMUSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.37%

-13.83%

-31.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-4.56%

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.08%

-13.83%

-24.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.55%

-2.49%

-8.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.81%

-3.44%

-13.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

1.25%

+2.41%

Volatility

ECON vs. MUST - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) has a higher volatility of 10.51% compared to Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) at 1.84%. This indicates that ECON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ECONMUSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.51%

1.84%

+8.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.20%

3.43%

+11.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.30%

6.60%

+13.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.82%

5.38%

+14.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.84%

5.60%

+15.24%