ECON vs. FLCH
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH).
ECON and FLCH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ECON is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Emerging Markets Consumer Titans Index. It was launched on Sep 14, 2010. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both ECON and FLCH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ECON or FLCH.
Correlation
The correlation between ECON and FLCH is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ECON vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ECON:
0.65
FLCH:
1.51
ECON:
1.04
FLCH:
2.20
ECON:
1.13
FLCH:
1.30
ECON:
0.27
FLCH:
0.82
ECON:
1.93
FLCH:
3.65
ECON:
4.90%
FLCH:
12.77%
ECON:
14.47%
FLCH:
30.81%
ECON:
-45.37%
FLCH:
-62.09%
ECON:
-27.42%
FLCH:
-37.25%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECON achieves a 6.94% return, which is significantly lower than FLCH's 17.99% return.
ECON
6.94%
5.37%
4.17%
8.01%
0.11%
-0.79%
FLCH
17.99%
19.02%
33.36%
42.33%
-0.50%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ECON vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECON has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ECON vs. FLCH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ECON
FLCH
ECON vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ECON vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
ECON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than FLCH's 2.44% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF | 0.71% | 0.76% | 1.57% | 2.05% | 1.08% | 0.63% | 1.68% | 0.98% | 0.35% | 0.74% | 1.11% | 1.20% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.44% | 2.88% | 3.46% | 2.69% | 1.49% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ECON vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECON drawdown since its inception was -45.37%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECON and FLCH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ECON vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) is 3.52%, while Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that ECON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.