PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECON vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECON vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECON achieves a 38.95% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ECON has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 6.94%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.


ECON

1D
0.62%
1M
10.79%
YTD
38.95%
6M
40.59%
1Y
67.92%
3Y*
24.55%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
6.94%

SPY

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.09%
YTD
9.74%
6M
9.27%
1Y
26.65%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*
15.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECON vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ECON
Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF
38.95%34.15%0.22%7.51%-16.00%-14.11%20.83%17.22%-26.87%27.46%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
9.74%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ECON and SPY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2010

0.67

The correlation between ECON and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (5 years) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ECON vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ECON
SPY

Technology

44.0%
39.0%

Financial Services

20.5%
11.1%

Industrials

6.7%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
9.9%

Basic Materials

5.5%
1.7%

Communication Services

5.3%
10.6%

Energy

3.5%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
4.5%

Healthcare

2.6%
8.3%

Utilities

1.8%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.8%

Technology

ECON
44.0%
SPY
39.0%

Financial Services

ECON
20.5%
SPY
11.1%

Industrials

ECON
6.7%
SPY
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ECON
6.1%
SPY
9.9%

Basic Materials

ECON
5.5%
SPY
1.7%

Communication Services

ECON
5.3%
SPY
10.6%

Energy

ECON
3.5%
SPY
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

ECON
2.9%
SPY
4.5%

Healthcare

ECON
2.6%
SPY
8.3%

Utilities

ECON
1.8%
SPY
2.1%

Real Estate

ECON
1.1%
SPY
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECON vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECON
ECON Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ECON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECON Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECON Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ECON Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECON Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECON vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECONSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.39

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

3.01

+1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.81

13.54

+4.28

ECON vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECON Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECON and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECON vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECON drawdown since its inception was -45.37%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECON and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECONSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.37%

-55.19%

+9.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-8.88%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

-18.76%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.08%

-24.50%

-13.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.37%

-33.72%

-11.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.75%

+1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-9.04%

-7.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

1.97%

+1.86%

Volatility

ECON vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.64%. This indicates that ECON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECONSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.21%

4.64%

+7.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.60%

9.75%

+10.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.93%

12.43%

+10.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.83%

17.14%

+3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.25%

17.99%

+3.26%

ECON vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECON has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECON vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

ECON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECON
Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF
1.28%1.77%0.76%1.57%2.06%1.08%0.63%1.68%0.98%0.35%0.74%1.10%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECON and SPY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECON has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECON dropped -45.37% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs 6.94% for ECON. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 6.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ECON.

ECON has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.

ECON is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. ECON tracks Dow Jones Emerging Markets Consumer Titans Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ECON and 0.09% for SPY.

ECON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECON and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer