ECON vs. SPY
ECON (Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECON is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Emerging Markets Consumer Titans Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ECON returned 6.94%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPY. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECON charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
ECON vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECON achieves a 38.95% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ECON has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 6.94%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
ECON
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 10.79%
- YTD
- 38.95%
- 6M
- 40.59%
- 1Y
- 67.92%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- 6.94%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
ECON vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF | 38.95% | 34.15% | 0.22% | 7.51% | -16.00% | -14.11% | 20.83% | 17.22% | -26.87% | 27.46% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECON and SPY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2010 | 0.67 |
The correlation between ECON and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (5 years) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ECON vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECON
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
ECON
SPY
Financial Services
ECON
SPY
Industrials
ECON
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
ECON
SPY
Basic Materials
ECON
SPY
Communication Services
ECON
SPY
Energy
ECON
SPY
Consumer Defensive
ECON
SPY
Healthcare
ECON
SPY
Utilities
ECON
SPY
Real Estate
ECON
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECON vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
ECON
SPY
ECON vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECON | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.39 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.96 | 3.01 | +1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.81 | 13.54 | +4.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECON vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECON drawdown since its inception was -45.37%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECON and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECON | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.37% | -55.19% | +9.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -8.88% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | -18.76% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.08% | -24.50% | -13.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.37% | -33.72% | -11.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.75% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.60% | -9.04% | -7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 1.97% | +1.86% |
Volatility
ECON vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.64%. This indicates that ECON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECON | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.21% | 4.64% | +7.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.60% | 9.75% | +10.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.93% | 12.43% | +10.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 17.14% | +3.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 17.99% | +3.26% |
ECON vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECON has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECON vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
ECON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF | 1.28% | 1.77% | 0.76% | 1.57% | 2.06% | 1.08% | 0.63% | 1.68% | 0.98% | 0.35% | 0.74% | 1.10% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECON and SPY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECON has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECON dropped -45.37% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs 6.94% for ECON. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 6.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ECON.
ECON has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
ECON is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. ECON tracks Dow Jones Emerging Markets Consumer Titans Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ECON and 0.09% for SPY.
ECON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECON and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer