PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECO vs. FN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ECO vs. FN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and Fabrinet (FN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECO achieves a 65.79% return, which is significantly higher than FN's 26.02% return.


ECO

1D
2.84%
1M
0.83%
YTD
65.79%
6M
65.40%
1Y
148.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FN

1D
-1.82%
1M
-18.48%
YTD
26.02%
6M
20.67%
1Y
115.55%
3Y*
64.45%
5Y*
44.47%
10Y*
31.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECO vs. FN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
65.79%71.94%-11.70%-1.25%
FN
Fabrinet
26.02%107.06%15.53%15.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ECO and FN is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ECO:

$2.00B

FN:

$20.78B

EPS

ECO:

$5.83

FN:

$11.65

PE Ratio

ECO:

9.00

FN:

49.26

PEG Ratio

ECO:

0.85

FN:

2.11

PS Ratio

ECO:

3.71

FN:

4.90

PB Ratio

ECO:

2.76

FN:

9.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

ECO:

$481.57M

FN:

$4.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ECO:

$274.61M

FN:

$509.75M

EBITDA (TTM)

ECO:

$284.05M

FN:

$422.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECO vs. FN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECO
ECO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FN
FN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECO vs. FN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECOFNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.29

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.23

5.04

+3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.50

12.51

+10.99

ECO vs. FN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECO Sharpe Ratio is 3.63, which is higher than the FN Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECO and FN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECO vs. FN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECO drawdown since its inception was -46.15%, smaller than the maximum FN drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECO and FN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECOFNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.15%

-70.46%

+24.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.66%

-23.14%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-23.14%

+18.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.08%

-22.58%

+7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.23%

9.31%

-3.08%

Volatility

ECO vs. FN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) is 12.35%, while Fabrinet (FN) has a volatility of 24.51%. This indicates that ECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECOFNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.35%

24.51%

-12.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.55%

55.49%

-24.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.08%

67.10%

-27.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.87%

53.82%

-11.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.87%

48.37%

-6.50%

Dividends

ECO vs. FN - Dividend Comparison

ECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.53%, while FN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
9.53%6.26%15.57%
FN
Fabrinet
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ECO vs. FN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp and Fabrinet. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
170.17M
1.21B
(ECO) Total Revenue
(FN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ECO vs. FN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp and Fabrinet over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
64.5%
11.9%
Portfolio components
ECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a gross profit of 109.68M and revenue of 170.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.5%.

FN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

ECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported an operating income of 98.06M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.6%.

FN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

ECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a net income of 88.32M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in a net margin of 51.9%.

FN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ECO and FN have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FN has higher volatility (24.51%) compared to ECO (12.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECO dropped -46.15% vs FN's -70.46%.

ECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECO and FN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer