ECNS vs. THD
ECNS (iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF) and THD (iShares MSCI Thailand ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - ECNS tracks the MSCI China Small Cap Index while THD tracks the MSCI Thailand Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ECNS returned 1.88%/yr vs 3.47%/yr for THD. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
ECNS vs. THD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECNS achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly lower than THD's 24.17% return. Over the past 10 years, ECNS has underperformed THD with an annualized return of 1.88%, while THD has yielded a comparatively higher 3.47% annualized return.
ECNS
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- -6.37%
- YTD
- -4.50%
- 6M
- -7.48%
- 1Y
- 13.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- -6.97%
- 10Y*
- 1.88%
THD
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 24.17%
- 6M
- 25.06%
- 1Y
- 42.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.47%
ECNS vs. THD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | -4.50% | 36.49% | 5.64% | -23.05% | -24.58% | 2.11% | 25.42% | 7.84% | -18.27% | 27.55% |
THD iShares MSCI Thailand ETF | 24.17% | 2.36% | -2.21% | -12.63% | 1.22% | 1.87% | -9.89% | 8.32% | -8.25% | 31.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECNS and THD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010 | 0.45 |
ECNS vs. THD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECNS
THD
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
ECNS
THD
Technology
ECNS
THD
Industrials
ECNS
THD
Real Estate
ECNS
THD
Consumer Cyclical
ECNS
THD
Basic Materials
ECNS
THD
Communication Services
ECNS
THD
Financial Services
ECNS
THD
Consumer Defensive
ECNS
THD
Energy
ECNS
THD
Utilities
ECNS
THD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECNS vs. THD — Risk / Return Rank
ECNS
THD
ECNS vs. THD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECNS | THD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.32 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 3.25 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.51 | 9.35 | -7.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECNS | THD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 1.88 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.04 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | 0.16 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.18 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
ECNS vs. THD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECNS drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, roughly equal to the maximum THD drawdown of -64.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECNS and THD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECNS | THD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.43% | -64.22% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.08% | -13.12% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.72% | -34.11% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.61% | -40.24% | -19.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.43% | -49.32% | -14.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.52% | -8.82% | -29.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.39% | -18.28% | -11.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.14% | 4.58% | +4.56% |
Volatility
ECNS vs. THD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) is 5.64%, while iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that ECNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECNS | THD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 6.41% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.87% | 18.28% | -5.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.92% | 22.67% | -1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.44% | 19.79% | +9.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.90% | 21.58% | +4.32% |
ECNS vs. THD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ECNS and THD have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
ECNS vs. THD - Dividend Comparison
ECNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%, more than THD's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | 6.49% | 6.20% | 5.98% | 4.89% | 3.54% | 4.87% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 6.16% | 3.18% | 4.29% | 3.58% |
THD iShares MSCI Thailand ETF | 2.71% | 3.36% | 3.15% | 2.92% | 2.41% | 3.16% | 2.31% | 2.42% | 2.57% | 2.16% | 2.61% | 3.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECNS and THD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THD has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to ECNS (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECNS dropped -63.43% vs THD's -64.22%.
On 10-year performance, THD leads with 3.47% vs 1.88% for ECNS. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, ECNS has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, THD has performed better with a 3.47% return vs 1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ECNS and THD have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
ECNS has the higher dividend yield at 6.49%, compared with 2.71% for THD.
ECNS tracks MSCI China Small Cap Index, while THD tracks MSCI Thailand Investable Market Index.
THD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECNS and THD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer