PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECNS vs. THD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECNS vs. THD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECNS achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly lower than THD's 24.17% return. Over the past 10 years, ECNS has underperformed THD with an annualized return of 1.88%, while THD has yielded a comparatively higher 3.47% annualized return.


ECNS

1D
-2.25%
1M
-6.37%
YTD
-4.50%
6M
-7.48%
1Y
13.77%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
-6.97%
10Y*
1.88%

THD

1D
-0.75%
1M
5.54%
YTD
24.17%
6M
25.06%
1Y
42.49%
3Y*
5.77%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*
3.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECNS vs. THD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
-4.50%36.49%5.64%-23.05%-24.58%2.11%25.42%7.84%-18.27%27.55%
THD
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF
24.17%2.36%-2.21%-12.63%1.22%1.87%-9.89%8.32%-8.25%31.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ECNS and THD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010

0.45

ECNS vs. THD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ECNS
THD

Healthcare

19.8%
6.4%

Technology

16.9%
0.9%

Industrials

16.2%
29.3%

Real Estate

8.8%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
4.6%

Basic Materials

7.8%
3.5%

Communication Services

4.5%
10.3%

Financial Services

4.4%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
7.8%

Energy

3.4%
14.3%

Utilities

2.6%
6.7%

Healthcare

ECNS
19.8%
THD
6.4%

Technology

ECNS
16.9%
THD
0.9%

Industrials

ECNS
16.2%
THD
29.3%

Real Estate

ECNS
8.8%
THD
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ECNS
8.8%
THD
4.6%

Basic Materials

ECNS
7.8%
THD
3.5%

Communication Services

ECNS
4.5%
THD
10.3%

Financial Services

ECNS
4.4%
THD
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

ECNS
4.0%
THD
7.8%

Energy

ECNS
3.4%
THD
14.3%

Utilities

ECNS
2.6%
THD
6.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECNS vs. THD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECNS
ECNS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ECNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECNS Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ECNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECNS Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

THD
THD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
THD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
THD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
THD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
THD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECNS vs. THD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECNSTHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.32

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

3.25

-2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

9.35

-7.84

ECNS vs. THD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECNS Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the THD Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECNS and THD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECNSTHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

1.88

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

0.04

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.16

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.18

-0.16

Drawdowns

ECNS vs. THD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECNS drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, roughly equal to the maximum THD drawdown of -64.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECNS and THD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECNSTHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.43%

-64.22%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.08%

-13.12%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.72%

-34.11%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.61%

-40.24%

-19.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.43%

-49.32%

-14.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.52%

-8.82%

-29.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.39%

-18.28%

-11.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.14%

4.58%

+4.56%

Volatility

ECNS vs. THD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) is 5.64%, while iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that ECNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECNSTHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

6.41%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

18.28%

-5.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.92%

22.67%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.44%

19.79%

+9.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.90%

21.58%

+4.32%

ECNS vs. THD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ECNS and THD have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

ECNS vs. THD - Dividend Comparison

ECNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%, more than THD's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
6.49%6.20%5.98%4.89%3.54%4.87%3.59%3.23%6.16%3.18%4.29%3.58%
THD
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF
2.71%3.36%3.15%2.92%2.41%3.16%2.31%2.42%2.57%2.16%2.61%3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECNS and THD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THD has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to ECNS (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECNS dropped -63.43% vs THD's -64.22%.

On 10-year performance, THD leads with 3.47% vs 1.88% for ECNS. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, ECNS has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, THD has performed better with a 3.47% return vs 1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ECNS and THD have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

ECNS has the higher dividend yield at 6.49%, compared with 2.71% for THD.

ECNS tracks MSCI China Small Cap Index, while THD tracks MSCI Thailand Investable Market Index.

THD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECNS and THD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer