ECNS vs. SOXX
ECNS (iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECNS is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Small Cap Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ECNS returned 0.73%/yr vs 34.00%/yr for SOXX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ECNS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
ECNS vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECNS achieves a -13.41% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 84.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ECNS has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 0.73%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 34.00% annualized return.
ECNS
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -7.53%
- 6M
- -18.85%
- YTD
- -13.41%
- 1Y
- -8.94%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- -8.73%
- 10Y*
- 0.73%
SOXX
- 1D
- -4.77%
- 1M
- -7.11%
- 6M
- 67.77%
- YTD
- 84.03%
- 1Y
- 125.94%
- 3Y*
- 48.43%
- 5Y*
- 31.11%
- 10Y*
- 34.00%
ECNS vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | -13.41% | 36.49% | 5.64% | -23.05% | -24.58% | 2.11% | 25.42% | 7.84% | -18.27% | 27.55% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 84.03% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECNS and SOXX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2010 | 0.43 |
The correlation between ECNS and SOXX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ECNS vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECNS
SOXX
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ECNS
SOXX
-
Healthcare
ECNS
SOXX
-
Technology
ECNS
SOXX
Basic Materials
ECNS
SOXX
-
Real Estate
ECNS
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
ECNS
SOXX
-
Communication Services
ECNS
SOXX
-
Financial Services
ECNS
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
ECNS
SOXX
-
Energy
ECNS
SOXX
-
Utilities
ECNS
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECNS vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
ECNS
SOXX
ECNS vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECNS | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.44 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 8.03 | -8.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 25.14 | -25.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECNS vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECNS drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECNS and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECNS | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.43% | -70.21% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.73% | -15.77% | -9.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.72% | -41.36% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.38% | -45.75% | -12.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.43% | -45.75% | -17.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.26% | -15.48% | -28.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.46% | -19.92% | -9.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.64% | 5.03% | +6.61% |
Volatility
ECNS vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) is 6.17%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 22.50%. This indicates that ECNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECNS | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 22.50% | -16.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.93% | 36.44% | -22.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.99% | 42.11% | -21.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.47% | 37.77% | -8.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.80% | 34.27% | -8.47% |
ECNS vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECNS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECNS vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
ECNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, more than SOXX's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | 6.79% | 6.20% | 5.98% | 4.89% | 3.54% | 4.87% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 6.16% | 3.18% | 4.29% | 3.58% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.27% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECNS and SOXX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (22.50%) compared to ECNS (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECNS dropped -63.43% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 34.00% vs 0.73% for ECNS. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ECNS has been the lower-risk option at 6.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 34.00% return vs 0.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ECNS.
ECNS has the higher dividend yield at 6.79%, compared with 0.27% for SOXX.
ECNS is categorized as China Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. ECNS tracks MSCI China Small Cap Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ECNS and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECNS and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer