ECNS vs. SOXX
ECNS (iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECNS is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Small Cap Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ECNS returned 1.77%/yr vs 35.54%/yr for SOXX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ECNS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
ECNS vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECNS achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 100.26% return. Over the past 10 years, ECNS has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 1.77%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.54% annualized return.
ECNS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- -4.50%
- 6M
- -7.71%
- 1Y
- 11.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.75%
- 5Y*
- -6.97%
- 10Y*
- 1.77%
SOXX
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 24.86%
- YTD
- 100.26%
- 6M
- 97.20%
- 1Y
- 179.78%
- 3Y*
- 57.09%
- 5Y*
- 33.93%
- 10Y*
- 35.54%
ECNS vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | -4.50% | 36.49% | 5.64% | -23.05% | -24.58% | 2.11% | 25.42% | 7.84% | -18.27% | 27.55% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 100.26% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECNS and SOXX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010 | 0.43 |
The correlation between ECNS and SOXX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ECNS vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECNS
SOXX
Healthcare
-
Technology
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
ECNS
SOXX
-
Technology
ECNS
SOXX
Industrials
ECNS
SOXX
-
Real Estate
ECNS
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
ECNS
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
ECNS
SOXX
-
Communication Services
ECNS
SOXX
-
Financial Services
ECNS
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
ECNS
SOXX
-
Energy
ECNS
SOXX
-
Utilities
ECNS
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECNS vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
ECNS
SOXX
ECNS vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECNS | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.71 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 11.48 | -10.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.22 | 43.90 | -42.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECNS | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 5.29 | -4.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.94 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | 1.07 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.44 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
ECNS vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECNS drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECNS and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECNS | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.43% | -70.21% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.09% | -15.77% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.72% | -41.36% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.61% | -45.75% | -13.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.43% | -45.75% | -17.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.53% | -2.10% | -36.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.39% | -19.97% | -9.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.21% | 4.11% | +5.10% |
Volatility
ECNS vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) is 5.65%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 14.08%. This indicates that ECNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECNS | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 14.08% | -8.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.87% | 27.45% | -14.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.91% | 34.20% | -13.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.44% | 36.11% | -6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.89% | 33.43% | -7.54% |
ECNS vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECNS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECNS vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
ECNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%, more than SOXX's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | 6.49% | 6.20% | 5.98% | 4.89% | 3.54% | 4.87% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 6.16% | 3.18% | 4.29% | 3.58% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECNS and SOXX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (14.08%) compared to ECNS (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECNS dropped -63.43% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.54% vs 1.77% for ECNS. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ECNS has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.54% return vs 1.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ECNS.
ECNS has the higher dividend yield at 6.49%, compared with 0.28% for SOXX.
ECNS is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. ECNS tracks MSCI China Small Cap Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ECNS and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.29 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECNS and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer