PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECNS vs. OPPE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECNS vs. OPPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and WisdomTree European Opportunities Fund (OPPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECNS achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly lower than OPPE's 12.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ECNS has underperformed OPPE with an annualized return of 1.88%, while OPPE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.39% annualized return.


ECNS

1D
-2.25%
1M
-6.37%
YTD
-4.50%
6M
-7.48%
1Y
13.77%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
-6.97%
10Y*
1.88%

OPPE

1D
-0.60%
1M
3.71%
YTD
12.95%
6M
16.25%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
14.10%
10Y*
12.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECNS vs. OPPE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
-4.50%36.49%5.64%-23.05%-24.58%2.11%25.42%7.84%-18.27%27.55%
OPPE
WisdomTree European Opportunities Fund
12.95%38.80%10.42%19.80%-11.14%23.52%-2.92%28.60%-13.34%22.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ECNS and OPPE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2015

0.44

ECNS vs. OPPE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ECNS
OPPE

Healthcare

19.8%
4.8%

Technology

16.9%
7.2%

Industrials

16.2%
27.8%

Real Estate

8.8%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
3.1%

Basic Materials

7.8%
10.6%

Communication Services

4.5%
1.6%

Financial Services

4.4%
23.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.6%

Energy

3.4%
9.1%

Utilities

2.6%
6.6%

Healthcare

ECNS
19.8%
OPPE
4.8%

Technology

ECNS
16.9%
OPPE
7.2%

Industrials

ECNS
16.2%
OPPE
27.8%

Real Estate

ECNS
8.8%
OPPE
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ECNS
8.8%
OPPE
3.1%

Basic Materials

ECNS
7.8%
OPPE
10.6%

Communication Services

ECNS
4.5%
OPPE
1.6%

Financial Services

ECNS
4.4%
OPPE
23.3%

Consumer Defensive

ECNS
4.0%
OPPE
4.6%

Energy

ECNS
3.4%
OPPE
9.1%

Utilities

ECNS
2.6%
OPPE
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECNS vs. OPPE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECNS
ECNS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ECNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECNS Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ECNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECNS Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

OPPE
OPPE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
OPPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPPE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
OPPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPPE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECNS vs. OPPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and WisdomTree European Opportunities Fund (OPPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECNSOPPEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.37

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

3.28

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

12.49

-10.99

ECNS vs. OPPE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECNS Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the OPPE Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECNS and OPPE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECNSOPPEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

2.09

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

0.91

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.72

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.65

-0.63

Drawdowns

ECNS vs. OPPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECNS drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, which is greater than OPPE's maximum drawdown of -39.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECNS and OPPE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECNSOPPEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.43%

-39.28%

-24.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.08%

-8.83%

-9.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.72%

-15.04%

-16.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.61%

-24.49%

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.43%

-39.28%

-24.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.52%

-0.60%

-37.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.39%

-5.47%

-23.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.14%

2.31%

+6.83%

Volatility

ECNS vs. OPPE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and WisdomTree European Opportunities Fund (OPPE) have volatilities of 5.64% and 5.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECNSOPPEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

5.49%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

11.66%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.92%

13.86%

+7.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.44%

15.55%

+13.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.90%

17.17%

+8.73%

ECNS vs. OPPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECNS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than OPPE's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECNS vs. OPPE - Dividend Comparison

ECNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%, more than OPPE's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
6.49%6.20%5.98%4.89%3.54%4.87%3.59%3.23%6.16%3.18%4.29%3.58%
OPPE
WisdomTree European Opportunities Fund
2.72%2.95%3.99%3.53%5.13%2.39%3.42%3.08%2.34%1.46%2.60%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECNS and OPPE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECNS has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to OPPE (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECNS dropped -63.43% vs OPPE's -39.28%.

On 10-year performance, OPPE leads with 12.39% vs 1.88% for ECNS. On fees, OPPE is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, OPPE has been the lower-risk option at 5.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, OPPE has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OPPE is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ECNS.

ECNS has the higher dividend yield at 6.49%, compared with 2.72% for OPPE.

ECNS is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while OPPE is Europe Equities. ECNS tracks MSCI China Small Cap Index, while OPPE tracks WisdomTree European Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ECNS and 0.58% for OPPE.

OPPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECNS and OPPE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer