ECNS vs. MKOR
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR).
ECNS and MKOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ECNS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Small Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2010. MKOR is an actively managed fund by Matthews. It was launched on Oct 29, 2010.
Performance
ECNS vs. MKOR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ECNS vs. MKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | -0.77% | 36.49% | 5.64% | -10.61% |
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF | 26.80% | 70.33% | -15.76% | -2.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECNS achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than MKOR's 26.80% return.
ECNS
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -9.47%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- -14.00%
- 1Y
- 24.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- -5.59%
- 10Y*
- 2.22%
MKOR
- 1D
- 5.51%
- 1M
- -16.25%
- YTD
- 26.80%
- 6M
- 48.56%
- 1Y
- 109.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ECNS vs. MKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECNS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than MKOR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ECNS vs. MKOR — Risk / Return Rank
ECNS
MKOR
ECNS vs. MKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECNS | MKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 3.49 | -2.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 3.88 | -2.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.55 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 5.23 | -3.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.09 | 22.29 | -19.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECNS | MKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 3.49 | -2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.98 | -0.95 |
Correlation
The correlation between ECNS and MKOR is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ECNS vs. MKOR - Dividend Comparison
ECNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than MKOR's 2.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | 6.25% | 6.20% | 5.98% | 4.89% | 3.54% | 4.87% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 6.16% | 3.18% | 4.29% | 3.58% |
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF | 2.07% | 2.62% | 5.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ECNS vs. MKOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECNS drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, which is greater than MKOR's maximum drawdown of -22.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECNS and MKOR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECNS | MKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.43% | -22.09% | -41.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.93% | -20.62% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.12% | -16.25% | -19.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.32% | -6.39% | -22.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.58% | 4.84% | +2.74% |
Volatility
ECNS vs. MKOR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) is 7.46%, while Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) has a volatility of 20.30%. This indicates that ECNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ECNS | MKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.46% | 20.30% | -12.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.18% | 27.34% | -12.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.22% | 31.64% | -6.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.43% | 24.25% | +5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.05% | 24.25% | +1.80% |