ECLN vs. ROBT
ECLN (First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF) and ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECLN is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while ROBT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. ECLN is actively managed, while ROBT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECLN returned 11.85%/yr vs 2.38%/yr for ROBT. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ECLN charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ROBT.
Performance
ECLN vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECLN achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly lower than ROBT's 14.22% return.
ECLN
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 19.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- —
ROBT
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- 13.18%
- YTD
- 14.22%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 30.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.10%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- —
ECLN vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 12.15% | 16.78% | 22.60% | -3.36% | 5.28% | 12.26% | 8.98% | 5.66% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 14.22% | 15.16% | -0.41% | 27.77% | -34.94% | 9.91% | 46.18% | 9.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECLN and ROBT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2019 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ECLN and ROBT has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ECLN vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECLN
ROBT
Utilities
-
Energy
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
ECLN
ROBT
-
Energy
ECLN
ROBT
Industrials
ECLN
ROBT
Technology
ECLN
ROBT
Basic Materials
ECLN
-
ROBT
-
Communication Services
ECLN
-
ROBT
Consumer Cyclical
ECLN
-
ROBT
Consumer Defensive
ECLN
-
ROBT
Financial Services
ECLN
-
ROBT
Healthcare
ECLN
-
ROBT
Real Estate
ECLN
-
ROBT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECLN vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank
ECLN
ROBT
ECLN vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECLN | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.22 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 1.42 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.36 | 4.09 | +6.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECLN | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.32 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.09 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.35 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
ECLN vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECLN drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum ROBT drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECLN and ROBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECLN | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.28% | -44.47% | +12.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.02% | -21.66% | +16.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | -27.68% | +13.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.88% | -43.26% | +23.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | -1.73% | -1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -15.97% | +10.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 7.53% | -5.67% |
Volatility
ECLN vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) is 3.85%, while First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that ECLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECLN | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 6.46% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | 17.51% | -9.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 23.32% | -12.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 25.18% | -10.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 25.48% | -8.07% |
ECLN vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECLN has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECLN vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison
ECLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 1.83% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.54% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.68% | 0.71% | 0.00% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.68% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.42% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECLN and ROBT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROBT has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to ECLN (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECLN dropped -32.28% vs ROBT's -44.47%.
On 5-year performance, ECLN leads with 11.85% vs 2.38% for ROBT. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ECLN has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ECLN has performed better with a 11.85% return vs 2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.
ECLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.
ECLN is categorized as Utilities Equities, while ROBT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ECLN and 0.65% for ROBT.
ECLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECLN and ROBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer