ECLN vs. NFRX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ECLN (First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF) and NFRX (Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECLN charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFRX.

Performance

ECLN vs. NFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ECLN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFRX

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 1.75%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECLN vs. NFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF	7.37%
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF	9.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ECLN and NFRX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026	0.66

Return for Risk

ECLN vs. NFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ECLN	NFRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.02%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ECLN	NFRX	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	13.67%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	13.67%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	13.67%	—

ECLN vs. NFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECLN has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than NFRX's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECLN vs. NFRX - Dividend Comparison

ECLN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF	1.43%	1.97%	2.52%	2.54%	1.72%	1.66%	1.68%	0.71%
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECLN and NFRX in my portfolio?

ECLN and NFRX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ECLN or NFRX?

On fees, NFRX is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ECLN or NFRX?

NFRX is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ECLN or NFRX?

ECLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.98% for NFRX.

What is the main difference between ECLN and NFRX?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Harrison Street. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ECLN and 0.80% for NFRX.