ECLN vs. BILT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ECLN (First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF) and BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ECLN charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BILT.

Performance

ECLN vs. BILT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ECLN having a 12.15% return and BILT slightly higher at 12.39%.

ECLN

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -2.95%
• YTD: 12.15%
• 6M: 10.16%
• 1Y: 19.15%
• 3Y*: 17.15%
• 5Y*: 11.85%
• 10Y*: —

BILT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.24%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 11.87%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECLN vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF	12.15%	1.15%
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF	12.39%	3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between ECLN and BILT is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

ECLN vs. BILT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECLN

ECLN Risk / Return Rank: 59
ECLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ECLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ECLN Omega Ratio Rank: 50
ECLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ECLN Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECLN vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ECLN	BILT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.83	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.36	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ECLN	BILT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	2.00	-1.32

Drawdowns

ECLN vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECLN drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECLN and BILT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECLN	BILT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.28%	-5.38%	-26.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.65%	-2.36%	-1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-1.44%	-3.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ECLN	BILT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.15%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.51%	10.28%	+0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.22%	10.28%	+3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.41%	10.28%	+7.13%

ECLN vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECLN has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BILT's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECLN vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison

ECLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than BILT's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF	1.33%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF	1.83%	1.97%	2.52%	2.54%	1.72%	1.66%	1.68%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECLN and BILT in my portfolio?

ECLN and BILT have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ECLN or BILT?

On fees, BILT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ECLN or BILT?

BILT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ECLN or BILT?

ECLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.33% for BILT.

What is the main difference between ECLN and BILT?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ECLN and 0.60% for BILT.