ECH vs. LNC
ECH (iShares MSCI Chile ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Chile Investable Market Index, while LNC (Lincoln National Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, ECH returned 4.44%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for LNC. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ECH vs. LNC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECH achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than LNC's -14.56% return. Over the past 10 years, ECH has outperformed LNC with an annualized return of 4.44%, while LNC has yielded a comparatively lower 2.50% annualized return.
ECH
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 36.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 4.44%
LNC
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- -14.56%
- 6M
- -17.67%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 21.93%
- 5Y*
- -4.22%
- 10Y*
- 2.50%
ECH vs. LNC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF | 2.23% | 65.41% | -8.67% | 9.01% | 25.12% | -19.80% | -7.13% | -17.79% | -18.98% | 41.79% |
LNC Lincoln National Corporation | -14.56% | 48.02% | 24.78% | -5.55% | -53.53% | 39.49% | -11.08% | 17.95% | -31.98% | 17.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECH and LNC is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2007 | 0.39 |
The correlation between ECH and LNC shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECH vs. LNC — Risk / Return Rank
ECH
LNC
ECH vs. LNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) and Lincoln National Corporation (LNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECH | LNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.12 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 0.61 | +1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 1.27 | +3.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECH vs. LNC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECH drawdown since its inception was -74.08%, smaller than the maximum LNC drawdown of -92.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECH and LNC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECH | LNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.08% | -92.87% | +18.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.74% | -29.13% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.59% | -29.13% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.59% | -73.14% | +47.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.89% | -79.19% | +12.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.03% | -38.58% | +14.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.48% | -25.05% | -12.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.33% | 13.84% | -5.51% |
Volatility
ECH vs. LNC - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) at 7.69%. This indicates that ECH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECH | LNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 7.69% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.20% | 24.95% | -3.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.51% | 33.33% | -7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 42.85% | -15.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 46.75% | -19.48% |
Dividends
ECH vs. LNC - Dividend Comparison
ECH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than LNC's 4.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF | 1.93% | 2.01% | 3.12% | 4.77% | 6.73% | 5.49% | 2.16% | 2.47% | 2.37% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 2.13% |
LNC Lincoln National Corporation | 4.84% | 4.04% | 5.68% | 6.67% | 5.86% | 2.46% | 3.18% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 1.51% | 1.51% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECH and LNC have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECH has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to LNC (7.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECH dropped -74.08% vs LNC's -92.87%.
ECH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECH and LNC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer