ECH vs. IPOS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ECH (iShares MSCI Chile ETF) and IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - ECH tracks the MSCI Chile Investable Market Index while IPOS tracks the Renaissance International IPO Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ECH returned 4.49%/yr vs 4.08%/yr for IPOS. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ECH charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for IPOS.

Performance

ECH vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECH achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 48.14% return. Over the past 10 years, ECH has outperformed IPOS with an annualized return of 4.49%, while IPOS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.08% annualized return.

ECH

• 1D: -2.38%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: 1.60%
• 1Y: 35.27%
• 3Y*: 14.56%
• 5Y*: 10.67%
• 10Y*: 4.49%

IPOS

• 1D: -4.56%
• 1M: 15.69%
• YTD: 48.14%
• 6M: 46.95%
• 1Y: 76.08%
• 3Y*: 20.01%
• 5Y*: -6.66%
• 10Y*: 4.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECH vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF	0.19%	65.41%	-8.67%	9.01%	25.12%	-19.80%	-7.13%	-17.79%	-18.98%	41.79%
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	48.14%	39.93%	-12.34%	-16.49%	-33.46%	-30.62%	50.71%	30.93%	-22.33%	36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ECH and IPOS is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014	0.36

The correlation between ECH and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ECH vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ECH	IPOS
Financial Services	21.8%	7.3%
Basic Materials	20.1%	3.8%
Industrials	15.7%	13.4%
Utilities	12.9%	3.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	6.3%
Real Estate	7.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	4.2%
Communication Services	1.7%	0.3%
Energy	-	4.9%
Healthcare	-	14.9%
Technology	-	50.2%

Return for Risk

ECH vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECH

ECH Risk / Return Rank: 37
ECH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
ECH Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
ECH Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ECH Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ECH Martin Ratio Rank: 30

IPOS

IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 77
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECH vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ECH	IPOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	2.36	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	2.88	-0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.42	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	4.46	-2.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.20	13.34	-9.13

ECH vs. IPOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECH Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the IPOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECH and IPOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ECH vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECH drawdown since its inception was -74.08%, roughly equal to the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECH and IPOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECH	IPOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.08%	-73.09%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.74%	-17.17%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.59%	-34.08%	+8.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.59%	-69.93%	+44.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.89%	-73.09%	+6.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.55%	-37.05%	+11.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.48%	-32.02%	-5.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.42%	5.72%	+2.70%

Volatility

ECH vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) is 8.96%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 15.81%. This indicates that ECH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECH	IPOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.96%	15.81%	-6.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.27%	29.95%	-8.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.61%	32.50%	-6.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.64%	27.95%	-0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.24%	24.41%	+2.83%

ECH vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECH vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison

ECH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than IPOS's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF	1.97%	2.01%	3.12%	4.77%	6.73%	5.49%	2.16%	2.47%	2.37%	1.42%	1.85%	2.13%
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	0.32%	1.04%	0.93%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.25%	0.89%	1.12%	0.87%	1.73%	1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECH and IPOS in my portfolio?

ECH and IPOS have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ECH or IPOS?

IPOS has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to ECH (8.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECH dropped -74.08% vs IPOS's -73.09%.

Which ETF is better, ECH or IPOS?

On 10-year performance, ECH leads with 4.49% vs 4.08% for IPOS. On fees, ECH is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ECH has been the lower-risk option at 8.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ECH or IPOS?

Over the 10-year period, ECH has performed better with a 4.49% return vs 4.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ECH or IPOS?

ECH is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ECH or IPOS?

ECH has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.32% for IPOS.

What is the main difference between ECH and IPOS?

ECH tracks MSCI Chile Investable Market Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ECH and 0.80% for IPOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.