PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECAT vs. PUTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ECAT vs. PUTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ECAT vs. PUTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
-6.71%16.64%19.96%32.36%-21.90%-6.25%
PUTW
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
-1.66%14.45%17.18%15.53%-10.11%5.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECAT achieves a -6.71% return, which is significantly lower than PUTW's -1.66% return.


ECAT

1D
1.49%
1M
-8.56%
YTD
-6.71%
6M
-7.80%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
10Y*

PUTW

1D
2.60%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
-1.66%
6M
1.99%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
7.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ECAT vs. PUTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECAT has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than PUTW's 0.44% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ECAT vs. PUTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECAT
ECAT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ECAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECAT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ECAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

PUTW
PUTW Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PUTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUTW Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PUTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUTW Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECAT vs. PUTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECATPUTWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.42

1.10

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.68

1.65

-0.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.27

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

1.62

-1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.75

8.70

-6.96

ECAT vs. PUTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the PUTW Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECAT and PUTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECATPUTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

1.10

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.61

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between ECAT and PUTW is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ECAT vs. PUTW - Dividend Comparison

ECAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.39%, more than PUTW's 12.37% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
25.39%23.00%17.44%9.14%8.94%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PUTW
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
12.37%13.18%11.99%8.94%3.27%0.00%1.43%1.47%6.46%3.52%2.27%

Drawdowns

ECAT vs. PUTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECAT drawdown since its inception was -32.23%, which is greater than PUTW's maximum drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECAT and PUTW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ECATPUTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.23%

-28.40%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-9.90%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.48%

-4.73%

-5.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-3.48%

-5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

1.85%

+1.64%

Volatility

ECAT vs. PUTW - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW) at 4.77%. This indicates that ECAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ECATPUTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

4.77%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

7.82%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.97%

14.33%

+2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

12.21%

+4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

13.23%

+3.72%