EBSIX vs. MBXAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX).
EBSIX is managed by Campbell & Company. It was launched on Mar 4, 2013. MBXAX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Dec 27, 2015.
Performance
EBSIX vs. MBXAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EBSIX vs. MBXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBSIX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares | 7.80% | -1.14% | 11.63% | -1.83% | 30.91% | 9.05% | 4.94% |
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund | 7.93% | 4.13% | 13.17% | -0.91% | 7.46% | 16.62% | 14.14% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EBSIX having a 7.80% return and MBXAX slightly higher at 7.93%.
EBSIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- 1Y
- 1.08%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- —
MBXAX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 7.93%
- 6M
- 9.84%
- 1Y
- 14.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.68%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EBSIX vs. MBXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXAX's 2.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EBSIX vs. MBXAX — Risk / Return Rank
EBSIX
MBXAX
EBSIX vs. MBXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBSIX | MBXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 1.31 | -1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.34 | 1.75 | -1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.31 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 1.23 | -1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | 5.80 | -5.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBSIX | MBXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 1.31 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.69 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.65 | +0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between EBSIX and MBXAX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EBSIX vs. MBXAX - Dividend Comparison
EBSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, while MBXAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBSIX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares | 2.93% | 3.16% | 2.90% | 1.82% | 15.10% | 7.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.43% | 2.02% | 7.57% | 0.00% | 3.92% | 4.96% | 3.07% | 3.35% | 1.82% |
Drawdowns
EBSIX vs. MBXAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBSIX drawdown since its inception was -10.96%, smaller than the maximum MBXAX drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBSIX and MBXAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBSIX | MBXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.96% | -31.75% | +20.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.43% | -11.29% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.96% | -15.66% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.64% | +1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -4.11% | +0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 2.39% | +1.98% |
Volatility
EBSIX vs. MBXAX - Volatility Comparison
Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) at 2.35%. This indicates that EBSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EBSIX | MBXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 2.35% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.19% | 5.24% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.50% | 11.79% | -3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.59% | 11.76% | -2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.52% | 13.44% | -3.92% |