PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBXAX vs. GPAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBXAX vs. GPAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) and Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund (GPAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBXAX achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than GPAIX's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, MBXAX has outperformed GPAIX with an annualized return of 7.41%, while GPAIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.32% annualized return.


MBXAX

1D
-0.29%
1M
-2.04%
6M
8.41%
YTD
12.74%
1Y
17.15%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
7.41%
ALL TIME*
8.86%

GPAIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.17%
6M
-1.26%
YTD
3.51%
1Y
11.82%
3Y*
6.34%
5Y*
4.16%
10Y*
4.32%
ALL TIME*
4.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MBXAX vs. GPAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
12.74%4.13%13.17%-0.91%7.46%16.62%-0.72%13.59%-2.43%13.69%
GPAIX
Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund
3.51%12.24%1.33%4.02%-1.88%5.70%9.09%14.33%-5.96%12.36%

Correlation

The correlation between MBXAX and GPAIX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.42

The correlation between MBXAX and GPAIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (5 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBXAX vs. GPAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MBXAX
MBXAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MBXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

GPAIX
GPAIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GPAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GPAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MBXAX vs. GPAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) and Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund (GPAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MBXAXGPAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.26

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

1.84

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.56

4.37

+10.20

MBXAX vs. GPAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBXAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the GPAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBXAX and GPAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MBXAX vs. GPAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBXAX drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, which is greater than GPAIX's maximum drawdown of -17.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBXAX and GPAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBXAXGPAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.75%

-17.16%

-14.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.89%

-6.01%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.66%

-6.59%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.66%

-9.13%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.75%

-17.16%

-14.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.69%

-4.14%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-4.19%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

2.53%

-1.48%

Volatility

MBXAX vs. GPAIX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) and Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund (GPAIX) have volatilities of 1.59% and 1.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBXAXGPAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

1.57%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.87%

5.49%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.87%

7.87%

-1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.39%

6.40%

+4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.36%

7.14%

+6.22%

MBXAX vs. GPAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBXAX has a 2.18% expense ratio, which is higher than GPAIX's 1.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBXAX vs. GPAIX - Dividend Comparison

MBXAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GPAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPAIX
Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund
3.33%3.44%2.01%1.98%2.71%10.90%1.78%13.29%1.51%1.68%1.92%1.49%
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%2.43%2.02%7.57%0.00%3.92%4.96%3.07%3.35%1.82%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBXAX and GPAIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBXAX has higher volatility (1.59%) compared to GPAIX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBXAX dropped -31.75% vs GPAIX's -17.16%.

MBXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBXAX and GPAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer