EBSIX vs. MBXIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX).
EBSIX is managed by Campbell & Company. It was launched on Mar 4, 2013. MBXIX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Dec 31, 1996.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EBSIX or MBXIX.
Key characteristics
| EBSIX | MBXIX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.67% | 14.05% |
| 1Y Return | 4.66% | 8.29% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.46% | 4.97% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.93% | 7.09% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.48 | 0.75 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.71 | 1.08 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.09 | 1.14 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.40 | 0.82 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.03 | 2.30 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.19% | 3.51% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.27% | 10.85% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.10% | -31.73% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.69% | -1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBSIX and MBXIX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EBSIX vs. MBXIX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EBSIX achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly lower than MBXIX's 14.05% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EBSIX vs. MBXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXIX's 2.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EBSIX vs. MBXIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EBSIX vs. MBXIX - Dividend Comparison
EBSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than MBXIX's 1.61% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBSIX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares | 1.67% | 1.81% | 2.34% | 6.61% | 0.00% | 10.31% | 14.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.09% | 6.01% |
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I | 1.61% | 1.84% | 4.16% | 0.00% | 4.27% | 5.18% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EBSIX vs. MBXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBSIX drawdown since its inception was -30.10%, smaller than the maximum MBXIX drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBSIX and MBXIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EBSIX vs. MBXIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) is 2.36%, while Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that EBSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.