PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EBSIX vs. QDSIX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EBSIX and QDSIX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

EBSIX vs. QDSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.00%
4.99%
EBSIX
QDSIX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EBSIX:

1.56

QDSIX:

2.19

Sortino Ratio

EBSIX:

2.18

QDSIX:

2.89

Omega Ratio

EBSIX:

1.28

QDSIX:

1.43

Calmar Ratio

EBSIX:

1.45

QDSIX:

1.86

Martin Ratio

EBSIX:

8.44

QDSIX:

6.17

Ulcer Index

EBSIX:

1.74%

QDSIX:

2.08%

Daily Std Dev

EBSIX:

9.46%

QDSIX:

5.87%

Max Drawdown

EBSIX:

-30.10%

QDSIX:

-7.06%

Current Drawdown

EBSIX:

0.00%

QDSIX:

-0.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBSIX achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly higher than QDSIX's 1.95% return.


EBSIX

YTD

2.87%

1M

3.51%

6M

6.00%

1Y

14.33%

5Y*

9.54%

10Y*

3.83%

QDSIX

YTD

1.95%

1M

2.45%

6M

4.98%

1Y

12.75%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EBSIX vs. QDSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QDSIX's 0.20% expense ratio.


EBSIX
Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares
Expense ratio chart for EBSIX: current value at 1.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.75%
Expense ratio chart for QDSIX: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EBSIX vs. QDSIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBSIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EBSIX is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EBSIX is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EBSIX is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EBSIX is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EBSIX is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EBSIX is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

QDSIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QDSIX is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QDSIX is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QDSIX is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QDSIX is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QDSIX is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QDSIX is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EBSIX vs. QDSIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EBSIX, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.562.19
The chart of Sortino ratio for EBSIX, currently valued at 2.18, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.182.89
The chart of Omega ratio for EBSIX, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.281.43
The chart of Calmar ratio for EBSIX, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.451.86
The chart of Martin ratio for EBSIX, currently valued at 8.44, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.008.446.17
EBSIX
QDSIX

The current EBSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the QDSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBSIX and QDSIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.56
2.19
EBSIX
QDSIX

Dividends

EBSIX vs. QDSIX - Dividend Comparison

EBSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than QDSIX's 3.15% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EBSIX
Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares
1.52%1.57%1.81%2.34%6.61%0.00%10.31%14.06%0.00%0.00%2.09%6.01%
QDSIX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund
3.15%3.21%11.18%8.06%4.70%1.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EBSIX vs. QDSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBSIX drawdown since its inception was -30.10%, which is greater than QDSIX's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBSIX and QDSIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember20250
-0.16%
EBSIX
QDSIX

Volatility

EBSIX vs. QDSIX - Volatility Comparison

Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) at 1.30%. This indicates that EBSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.09%
1.30%
EBSIX
QDSIX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab