EBSIX vs. AMFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX).
EBSIX is managed by Campbell & Company. It was launched on Mar 4, 2013. AMFAX is managed by Blackrock. It was launched on Jul 30, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EBSIX or AMFAX.
Performance
EBSIX vs. AMFAX - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBSIX achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly higher than AMFAX's -3.10% return. Over the past 10 years, EBSIX has outperformed AMFAX with an annualized return of 3.91%, while AMFAX has yielded a comparatively lower -0.50% annualized return.
EBSIX
5.33%
-1.76%
-0.52%
2.05%
8.07%
3.91%
AMFAX
-3.10%
1.39%
-13.62%
-5.02%
1.84%
-0.50%
Key characteristics
EBSIX | AMFAX | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 0.21 | -0.44 |
Sortino Ratio | 0.34 | -0.50 |
Omega Ratio | 1.04 | 0.94 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.19 | -0.13 |
Martin Ratio | 0.91 | -0.61 |
Ulcer Index | 2.24% | 8.21% |
Daily Std Dev | 9.79% | 11.45% |
Max Drawdown | -30.10% | -37.95% |
Current Drawdown | -5.67% | -36.13% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EBSIX vs. AMFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AMFAX's 1.72% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between EBSIX and AMFAX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EBSIX vs. AMFAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EBSIX vs. AMFAX - Dividend Comparison
EBSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares | 0.00% | 1.81% | 2.34% | 6.61% | 0.00% | 10.31% | 14.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.09% | 6.01% |
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A | 0.31% | 0.30% | 10.01% | 5.74% | 3.14% | 6.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.08% | 2.63% |
Drawdowns
EBSIX vs. AMFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBSIX drawdown since its inception was -30.10%, smaller than the maximum AMFAX drawdown of -37.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBSIX and AMFAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EBSIX vs. AMFAX - Volatility Comparison
Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX) at 3.04%. This indicates that EBSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.