PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBSIX vs. EBSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EBSIX vs. EBSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) and Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares (EBSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EBSIX having a 8.23% return and EBSAX slightly lower at 8.12%.


EBSIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
8.23%
6M
8.57%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*

EBSAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
8.12%
6M
8.47%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBSIX vs. EBSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EBSIX
Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares
8.23%-1.14%11.63%-1.83%30.91%9.05%4.94%
EBSAX
Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares
8.12%-1.34%11.28%-2.11%30.56%8.90%4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between EBSIX and EBSAX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2020

0.99

The correlation between EBSIX and EBSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EBSIX vs. EBSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBSIX
EBSIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
EBSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
EBSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

EBSAX
EBSAX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
EBSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
EBSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBSIX vs. EBSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) and Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares (EBSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EBSIXEBSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.16

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

1.24

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.95

2.84

+0.11

EBSIX vs. EBSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the EBSAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBSIX and EBSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EBSIX vs. EBSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBSIX drawdown since its inception was -10.96%, roughly equal to the maximum EBSAX drawdown of -11.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBSIX and EBSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EBSIXEBSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.96%

-11.15%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.88%

-5.83%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.26%

-10.26%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.96%

-11.15%

+0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.22%

-2.25%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-3.14%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.55%

-0.02%

Volatility

EBSIX vs. EBSAX - Volatility Comparison

Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares (EBSAX) at 1.90%. This indicates that EBSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EBSIXEBSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

1.90%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.93%

5.97%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.00%

8.07%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.52%

9.55%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.43%

9.44%

-0.01%

EBSIX vs. EBSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EBSAX's 2.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

EBSIX vs. EBSAX - Dividend Comparison

EBSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than EBSAX's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EBSAX
Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares
2.78%3.00%2.59%1.45%15.15%7.02%
EBSIX
Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares
2.92%3.16%2.90%1.82%15.10%7.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, EBSIX and EBSAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EBSIX has higher volatility (2.00%) compared to EBSAX (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBSIX dropped -10.96% vs EBSAX's -11.15%.

EBSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EBSIX and EBSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer