EBSAX vs. GPAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares (EBSAX) and Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund (GPAIX).
EBSAX is managed by Campbell & Company. It was launched on Mar 4, 2013. GPAIX is managed by Grant Park. It was launched on Dec 30, 2013.
Performance
EBSAX vs. GPAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EBSAX vs. GPAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBSAX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares | 7.79% | -1.34% | 11.28% | -2.11% | 30.56% | 8.90% | 4.88% |
GPAIX Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund | 1.93% | 12.24% | 1.33% | 4.02% | -1.88% | 5.70% | 5.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBSAX achieves a 7.79% return, which is significantly higher than GPAIX's 1.93% return.
EBSAX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 7.79%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 0.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- —
GPAIX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 4.19%
- 1Y
- 13.01%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- 4.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EBSAX vs. GPAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBSAX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GPAIX's 1.43% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EBSAX vs. GPAIX — Risk / Return Rank
EBSAX
GPAIX
EBSAX vs. GPAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares (EBSAX) and Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund (GPAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBSAX | GPAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.18 | 1.52 | -1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.30 | 2.06 | -1.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.28 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 2.16 | -1.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.33 | 7.36 | -7.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBSAX | GPAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | 1.52 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.65 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.69 | +0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between EBSAX and GPAIX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EBSAX vs. GPAIX - Dividend Comparison
EBSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than GPAIX's 3.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBSAX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares | 2.78% | 3.00% | 2.59% | 1.45% | 15.15% | 7.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPAIX Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund | 3.38% | 3.44% | 2.01% | 1.98% | 2.71% | 10.90% | 1.78% | 13.29% | 1.51% | 1.68% | 1.92% | 1.49% |
Drawdowns
EBSAX vs. GPAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBSAX drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, smaller than the maximum GPAIX drawdown of -17.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBSAX and GPAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBSAX | GPAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.15% | -17.16% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | -6.01% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.15% | -9.13% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.61% | +5.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -4.21% | +0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | 1.77% | +2.78% |
Volatility
EBSAX vs. GPAIX - Volatility Comparison
Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares (EBSAX) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund (GPAIX) at 2.62%. This indicates that EBSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EBSAX | GPAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 2.62% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.29% | 6.84% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.64% | 8.57% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.61% | 6.46% | +3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.53% | 7.21% | +2.32% |